From borja at codigo23.net Tue Jul 7 18:55:31 2015 From: borja at codigo23.net (Francisco de Borja Lopez Rio) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2015 18:55:31 +0200 Subject: [Python-buildbots] OpenBSD snapshot (5.8-beta) buildslave is back Message-ID: <20150707165531.GA84734@mail.codigo23.net> Hey guys, short announcement. After upgrading that box to the latest OpenBSD i386 snapshot, mercurial clones of the cpython repo work again (my guess, it was failing because of something in the libressl libs in OpenBSD -current). So, the slave is up and running again. Regards! -- "Do nothing which is of no use." - Miyamoto Musashi --------------------------------------------------------------------- Francisco de Borja Lopez Rio (borja at codigo23.net) Soluciones Informaticas Codigo23 S.L.U. http://www.codigo23.net From zachary.ware+pydev at gmail.com Tue Jul 7 20:25:26 2015 From: zachary.ware+pydev at gmail.com (Zachary Ware) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2015 13:25:26 -0500 Subject: [Python-buildbots] OpenBSD snapshot (5.8-beta) buildslave is back In-Reply-To: <20150707165531.GA84734@mail.codigo23.net> References: <20150707165531.GA84734@mail.codigo23.net> Message-ID: On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 11:55 AM, Francisco de Borja Lopez Rio wrote: > Hey guys, short announcement. > > After upgrading that box to the latest OpenBSD i386 snapshot, mercurial clones > of the cpython repo work again (my guess, it was failing because of something > in the libressl libs in OpenBSD -current). > > So, the slave is up and running again. That's great news, thanks! -- Zach From zachary.ware+pydev at gmail.com Tue Jul 7 21:20:15 2015 From: zachary.ware+pydev at gmail.com (Zachary Ware) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2015 14:20:15 -0500 Subject: [Python-buildbots] New buildbots active Message-ID: Hi folks, Just wanted to let you know in case you hadn't seen them that there are a couple of new buildbots in service: one that builds on Windows in Release configuration [1] and one that builds the documentation and runs a couple of style checks on it [2]. Both are currently in the 'unstable' set, but I expect both of them to graduate to 'stable' status soon after an audit of the stability of the whole fleet. [1] http://buildbot.python.org/all/buildslaves/ware-win81-release [2] http://buildbot.python.org/all/buildslaves/ware-gentoo If anyone has suggestions for improvements to the Docs bot, I'm all ears. Eventually, I'd like to add a doctest step, but there's a lot of work that needs to go into fixing the doctests before I do that. Regards, -- Zach P.S.: for those receiving this message on python-committers, you may notice that it is also cross-posted to python-buildbots, a list that was recently set up for discussion of our buildbot fleet, mostly between buildslave and buildmaster operators. If you're interested, subscription is open [3] and the list is mirrored on Gmane [4]. [3] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-buildbots [4] http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.devel.buildbots From antoine at python.org Tue Jul 7 21:38:08 2015 From: antoine at python.org (Antoine Pitrou) Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2015 21:38:08 +0200 Subject: [Python-buildbots] New buildbots active In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <559C2AA0.2030000@python.org> Thank you Zach! Regards Antoine. Le 07/07/2015 21:20, Zachary Ware a ?crit : > Hi folks, > > Just wanted to let you know in case you hadn't seen them that there > are a couple of new buildbots in service: one that builds on Windows > in Release configuration [1] and one that builds the documentation and > runs a couple of style checks on it [2]. Both are currently in the > 'unstable' set, but I expect both of them to graduate to 'stable' > status soon after an audit of the stability of the whole fleet. > > [1] http://buildbot.python.org/all/buildslaves/ware-win81-release > [2] http://buildbot.python.org/all/buildslaves/ware-gentoo > > If anyone has suggestions for improvements to the Docs bot, I'm all > ears. Eventually, I'd like to add a doctest step, but there's a lot > of work that needs to go into fixing the doctests before I do that. > > Regards, >