[issue43134] (list have item) instate (item in list)

[Mark Dickinson]

Mark Dickinson <dickinsm at gmail.com> added the comment:

@Masoud: There's a significant cost to introducing new syntax into Python; there need to be really significant benefits to justify that cost. In this case, the benefits are slight, and nowhere near the threshold needed to justify introducing a new keyword into the language.

Closing again; free free to comment further, but please don't re-open the issue.

----------
nosy: +mark.dickinson
status: open -> closed

_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue43134>
_______________________________________