[issue39698] asyncio.sleep() does not adhere to time.sleep() behavior for negative numbers

[Marco Sulla]

Marco Sulla <launchpad.net at marco.sulla.e4ward.com> added the comment:

> I also distinctly remember seeing code (and writing such code myself) that performs computation on timeouts and does not care if the end value goes below 0.

This is not a good statistics. Frankly we can't measure the impact of the change from these considerations. And furthermore, `asyncio.sleep()` is used often, testing and mocking apart? I doubt it.

> we always try to have a very good explanation "why" we want to bother ourselves and users to break backwards compat.

Coherence and unhide mistakes are *very* strong points.

That said, I'm not so much interested in practice. Do as you wish. The problem is I always considered Python a very elegant programming language, and this behavior is not elegant at all. But, hey, amen.

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue39698>
_______________________________________