[issue37345] Add formal support for UDPLITE protococl

Gabe Appleton report at bugs.python.org
Thu Jun 20 10:11:23 EDT 2019


Gabe Appleton <gabe at gabeappleton.me> added the comment:

Its true that this doesnt exist at the C level, however I worry that having it purely through getsockopt() and setsockopt() would make things more confusing, so I added it as a helper function.

I can remove it in lieu of documentation if that would block merging, though I dont think that is the right move here.

On June 20, 2019 10:54:58 AM UTC, Andrew Svetlov <report at bugs.python.org> wrote:
>
>Andrew Svetlov <andrew.svetlov at gmail.com> added the comment:
>
>Adding new constants like socket.IPPROTO_UDPLITE is fine.
>The question is: why we need a new function?
>There is no set_send_checksum_coverage() on C level IIRC
>
>----------
>nosy: +asvetlov
>
>_______________________________________
>Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
><https://bugs.python.org/issue37345>
>_______________________________________

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue37345>
_______________________________________


More information about the Python-bugs-list mailing list