[issue36322] Argument typo in dbm.ndbm.open

[Brett Cannon]

Brett Cannon <brett at python.org> added the comment:

So Terry is correct in so much as there is no parameter name. :) Both of the functions in question are positional-only, so the name actually doesn't matter beyond giving a way to reference the parameter in the documentation.

So thanks for the PR, Marco, but I'm going to reject this as there's nothing actually wrong with the gdbm or ndbm docs.

----------
resolution:  -> rejected
stage: patch review -> resolved
status: open -> closed

_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue36322>
_______________________________________