[issue34605] Avoid master/slave terminology

[Berker Peksag]

Berker Peksag <berker.peksag at gmail.com> added the comment:

Personally, I find parent/child more descriptive if it can be used in the same context with master/slave, so I'm in favor of replacing master/slave with parent/child where applicable.

However, I agree that the code changes in PR 9100 are a bit excessive. It would be nice if we could keep the members of the public API (some of them have already been deprecated) and variable/function/parameter names left out of this cleanup.

----------
components: +Documentation
nosy: +berker.peksag
type:  -> enhancement

_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<https://bugs.python.org/issue34605>
_______________________________________