[issue29758] Previously-working SWIG code fails in Python 3.6

[Brett Cannon]

Brett Cannon added the comment:

Please keep this issue closed until you hear back from the SWIG team. Just because your code worked under Python 3.5 doesn't mean SWIG didn't accidentally emit something that breaks under Python 3.6 because we started being more stringent about something. Basically unless we have C code (and not SWIG or C++ code) to reproduce this then we have to go on the assumption it's a problem on SWIG's side.

----------
resolution:  -> third party
status: open -> closed

_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue29758>
_______________________________________