[issue29752] Enum._missing_ not called for __getattr__ failures

[Josh Rosenberg]

Josh Rosenberg added the comment:

Could that perhaps be intentional? Attribute access seems like something where the developer would be explicitly naming a single, hard coded, canonical name for the type, while string construction seems like something where you're getting a string from "somewhere" (user input, which is always terrible) and you'd want to have a way to handle invalid input.

The documentation is so sparse as to be useless for determining intent:

_missing_ – a lookup function used when a value is not found; may be overridden

I wouldn't view Label.redapple as an attempt to "find" anything, it's just simple attribute access.

----------
nosy: +josh.r

_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue29752>
_______________________________________