[issue29425] File-altering aspects of pathlib should return new pathlib objects

[Walter Szeliga]

Walter Szeliga added the comment:

If Path.rename() were made to be slightly more than a wrapper around os.rename(), then any future changes to the return value of os.rename() could be taken into consideration in the return value of Path.rename(). I don't see how anything would become impossible then.

Creating the destination Path object explicitly is my solution right now. Since it had become such a pattern in my code, I figured it could be delegated up to the level of the Path object and make for cleaner looking code.

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue29425>
_______________________________________