[issue26460] datetime.strptime without a year fails on Feb 29

[Alexander Belopolsky]

Alexander Belopolsky added the comment:

> Python's time.strptime() behavior is consistent with that of glibc 2.19

Gregory,

I believe OP is complaining about the way datetime.datetime.strptime() behaves, not time.strptime() which is mentioned as (preferred?) alternative.


See msg261015  in issue 14157 for context.

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue26460>
_______________________________________