[issue26647] ceval: use Wordcode, 16-bit bytecode
STINNER Victor
report at bugs.python.org
Fri Apr 1 15:25:10 EDT 2016
STINNER Victor added the comment:
I reviewed wpy3.patch.
I concur with Raymond, it's really nice to have a regular structure for the bytecode.
--
Serhiy proposed to *reduce* the size of bytecode by adding new specialized bytecode which include the argument. For example (LOAD_CONST, 0) => LOAD_CONST_0. I would like to hear his opinion on this change.
https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/2016-February/038276.html
Data+code loaded by import is the top #1 memory consumer on basic scripts according to tracemalloc:
https://docs.python.org/dev/library/tracemalloc.html#examples
I don't know the ratio between data and code. But here we are only talking about the co_code fields of code objects. I guess that the file size of .pyc is a good estimation.
I don't think that the memory footprint of bytecode (co_code fields of code objects) really matters on computers (and smartphones?) of 2016.
*If* I have to choose between CPU performance and memory footprint, I choose the CPU!
--
> This does _not_ include having f_lasti be -1 instead of -2
IMHO it's ok to break the C API, but I would prefer to keep the backward compatibility for the Python API (replace any negative number with -1 for the Python API).
----------
_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue26647>
_______________________________________
More information about the Python-bugs-list
mailing list