[issue2292] Missing *-unpacking generalizations

[Guido van Rossum]

Guido van Rossum added the comment:

Yeah, but the docs don't need to be committed in time for beta 1. The
source code should go in ASAP, especially since the PEP 492 changes will
have to be merged in on top of them. @Thomas: which Monday were you
shooting for? I had hoped yesterday...

On Sat, May 2, 2015 at 6:52 PM, Benjamin Peterson <report at bugs.python.org>
wrote:

>
> Benjamin Peterson added the comment:
>
> It certainly would be nice to have documentation.
>
> ----------
>
> _______________________________________
> Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
> <http://bugs.python.org/issue2292>
> _______________________________________
>

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue2292>
_______________________________________