[issue2292] Missing *-unpacking generalizations

[Guido van Rossum]

Guido van Rossum added the comment:

Hi Neil,

I think disallowing them is the best approach. There doesn't seem to be a
good use case that would be thwarted. Hopefully the syntactic prohibition
isn't too hard to implement.

On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 4:32 PM, Neil Girdhar <report at bugs.python.org>
wrote:

>
> Neil Girdhar added the comment:
>
> All tests pass.
>
> @Guido: can we get some clarification on f(*… and f(**…?  One option is to
> make them illegal for now and then open them up in a future PEP when it's
> more clear what's wanted?
>
> ----------
> Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file37911/starunpack25.diff
>
> _______________________________________
> Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
> <http://bugs.python.org/issue2292>
> _______________________________________
>

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue2292>
_______________________________________