[issue24379] operator.subscript

[Joe Jevnik]

Joe Jevnik added the comment:

> and the latter might give the impression it was some sort of special method/attribute when it was not.

Wouldn't adding this be special because it is specifically reserved by CPython as an implementation detail?

Also, would adding this name (__stub or __stub__) be sufficient to get this patch merged again. I would not mind investigating the gc_head issue after but I view that as a separate issue which is only exercised by this patch.

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue24379>
_______________________________________