[issue21419] Use calloc() instead of malloc() for int << int (lshift)
Josh Rosenberg
report at bugs.python.org
Fri May 2 23:19:54 CEST 2014
Josh Rosenberg added the comment:
I swear, I need to refresh before I post a long comment.
If this is slowing everything down a little just to make 1 << (2 ** 29) faster (and did you really mean 1 << (1 << 29) ? :-) ), then I'd say drop it.
----------
_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue21419>
_______________________________________
More information about the Python-bugs-list
mailing list