[issue20092] type() constructor should bind __int__ to __index__ when __index__ is defined and __int__ is not

[Ethan Furman]

Ethan Furman added the comment:

Yes, that test should pass when this issue is resolved.

I can't tell from your comment what you are trying to do to resolve it, but the course of action I had in mind was to have the `type` meta-class make a final examination of the type it was creating, and if that type had __index__ but not __int__ then bind __int__ to __index__.

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue20092>
_______________________________________