[issue1641] asyncore delayed calls feature

[Guido van Rossum]

Guido van Rossum added the comment:

A new implementation is part of Tulip (tulip/selectors.py); once Tulip
is further along it will be a candidate for inclusion in the stdlib
(as socket.py) regardless of whether tulip itself will be accepted. I
have no plans to work on asyncore.

On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 12:03 PM, Terry J. Reedy <report at bugs.python.org> wrote:
>
> Terry J. Reedy added the comment:
>
> Where does this issue stand now?  Did the applied sched patch supersede the proposed asyncore patch? Is enhancing asyncore still on the table given Guido's proposed new module?
>
> ----------
> nosy: +terry.reedy
> versions: +Python 3.4 -Python 3.3
>
> _______________________________________
> Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
> <http://bugs.python.org/issue1641>
> _______________________________________

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1641>
_______________________________________