[issue11245] Implementation of IMAP IDLE in imaplib?

[R. David Murray]

R. David Murray added the comment:

To fully answer the original question that opened this issue: contributions will be welcomed.  While I don't currently have time to work on imaplib myself, I have an interest and will review and if appropriate commit patches.

I like Shay's proposal, but absent a patch along those lines having blocking IMAP support will definitely be an improvement.  An application needing to monitor more than one imap connection could do its own threading.

Thanks for proposing the patch.  Could you please submit a contributor agreement?  I probably won't have time to fully consider the proposed patch for a bit, but I've put it on my todo list.  

test_imaplib does have a testing framework now, do you think you could write tests for the new feature?

----------
components: +email
nosy: +barry
versions: +Python 3.4 -Python 3.3

_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue11245>
_______________________________________