[issue13959] Re-implement parts of imp in pure Python
Brett Cannon
report at bugs.python.org
Fri May 4 21:23:40 CEST 2012
Brett Cannon <brett at python.org> added the comment:
OK, I'm waiting on issue #14657 (avoiding the _frozen_importlib/importlib dichotomy) is resolved before I document the new imp.extension_suffixes() as it would be good to know where I should pull in the source and bytecode suffixes.
I think this only leaves get_magic() and get_tag() as the only things to move + trying to figure out how to handle PyImport_ExecCodeModuleObject() and its grip on various bits of C code.
----------
dependencies: +Avoid two importlib copies
_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue13959>
_______________________________________
More information about the Python-bugs-list
mailing list