[issue13959] Re-implement parts of imp in pure Python

Brett Cannon report at bugs.python.org
Fri May 4 21:23:40 CEST 2012


Brett Cannon <brett at python.org> added the comment:

OK, I'm waiting on issue #14657 (avoiding the _frozen_importlib/importlib dichotomy) is resolved before I document the new imp.extension_suffixes() as it would be good to know where I should pull in the source and bytecode suffixes.

I think this only leaves get_magic() and get_tag() as the only things to move + trying to figure out how to handle PyImport_ExecCodeModuleObject() and its grip on various bits of C code.

----------
dependencies: +Avoid two importlib copies

_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue13959>
_______________________________________


More information about the Python-bugs-list mailing list