[issue14908] datetime.datetime should have a timestamp() method
Barry A. Warsaw
report at bugs.python.org
Mon Jun 4 18:12:44 CEST 2012
Barry A. Warsaw <barry at python.org> added the comment:
On Jun 04, 2012, at 04:03 PM, Alexander Belopolsky wrote:
>That's a valuable experience. How big of a deal was the lack of
>.ticks() and .gmticks()? How did you work around it?
It was *much* less of an issue than all the magic date format parsing that
mxDT supports. That's actually something that I think is a more serious
deficiency, since .strptime() is pretty limited (e.g. how would you parse ISO
8601 dates both with and without the 'T'?). A Python 3 compatible time format
parser would make for a very nice separate library (PyPI) and/or addition to
the stdlib (eventually).
FWIW, here's the changeset.
http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~gwibber-committers/gwibber/trunk/revision/1354
----------
_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue14908>
_______________________________________
More information about the Python-bugs-list
mailing list