[issue6490] os.popen documentation in 2.6 is probably wrong

R. David Murray report at bugs.python.org
Mon May 30 17:40:09 CEST 2011


R. David Murray <rdmurray at bitdance.com> added the comment:

> The deprecations for os.popenN() are still fine, since those
> APIs are not used all that much, and I'm sure that no one can
> really remember what all the different versions do anyway :-)

That's good, because those functions are already gone in Python3 :)

Victor: did you notice that getoutput and friends call os.popen?

The one argument I can see for actually deprecating os.popen is that in general the os module functions are thin wrappers around the corresponding posix functions.  But that is only true in general, and os.popen was never a "thin" wrapper, at least on most platforms.

----------
nosy: +r.david.murray

_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue6490>
_______________________________________


More information about the Python-bugs-list mailing list