[issue11610] Improving property to accept abstract methods

[Darren Dale]

Darren Dale <dsdale24 at gmail.com> added the comment:

On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Benjamin Peterson
<report at bugs.python.org> wrote:
>
> Benjamin Peterson <benjamin at python.org> added the comment:
>
> 2011/5/14 Darren Dale <report at bugs.python.org>:
>>
>> Darren Dale <dsdale24 at gmail.com> added the comment:
>>
>> Is there anything preventing this patch from being merged?
>
> I have to make time to think about the API a bit more.

Ok. Maybe you will come up with another alternative that hadn't
occurred to me. But I have given this issue quite a bit of thought,
considered several alternatives, and felt fortunate to find a solution
that preserves backwards compatibility, supports the property
decorator syntax, and meshes well with the existing syntax for
abstract methods. Perhaps, if you shared your concerns, I could help
address them and maybe save you some time.

Darrren

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue11610>
_______________________________________