[issue10110] Queue doesn't recognize it is full after shrinking maxsize
Raymond Hettinger
report at bugs.python.org
Sat Oct 16 00:30:51 CEST 2010
Raymond Hettinger <rhettinger at users.sourceforge.net> added the comment:
That won't be necessary. The change from == to <= is innocuous.
There's no need to lock-up maxsize in a read-only property. We're consenting adults. Besides, it would probably break someone-else's odd use case. I don't want to expand the API, nor do I want to cripple anyone's ability to do weird stuff with it.
FWIW, the full() and empty() methods are usually not a good idea. It's better to catch a Full exception. Otherwise, the information can be out of date by the time you try to use it.
I'm going to mark this as a 3.2 only change. There were no guarantees about the behavior when maxsize is changed, nor should we make such guarantees.
----------
versions: -Python 2.7, Python 3.1
_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue10110>
_______________________________________
More information about the Python-bugs-list
mailing list