[issue8677] Modules needing PY_SSIZE_T_CLEAN

Martin v. Löwis report at bugs.python.org
Mon May 10 22:23:30 CEST 2010


Martin v. Löwis <martin at v.loewis.de> added the comment:

I personally don't think that a transition period would be a useful thing to have, in particular not if it goes like this:
- in version A, require use of PY_SSIZE_T_CLEAN
- in version A+1, make use of PY_SSIZE_T_CLEAN redundant

So I'd rather drop PY_SSIZE_T clean altogether from 3.2, and risk any breakage that this may cause.

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue8677>
_______________________________________


More information about the Python-bugs-list mailing list