[issue9008] CGIHTTPServer support for arbitrary CGI scripts

[anatoly techtonik]

anatoly techtonik <techtonik at gmail.com> added the comment:

> That's a lot of things which others do not perceive as important or even
> desireable. Chances are you are going to have to implement them yourself
> if you really want them. In any case, just complaining won't change
> anything.

I am just trying to answer why I can't contribute patches myself. Hope
the idea to put workflow first after getting enough experience over
past year was clear. I work on this workflow alone. If smb. would also
feel that is it a more important problem than immediate patch - I'd be
glad to collaborate.

>> Ok. Let me try to express it in English once more:
>> search: To be a maintainer I need:
>> replace: To be willing to become a maintainer I need:
>
> Nobody proposed you to become a maintainer, so this is still besides the
> point. First contribute significantly, and then we'll see.

Can you estimate my contributions so far?
I suspect I should stop wasting time if there are aren't any.

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue9008>
_______________________________________