[issue8299] Improve GIL in 2.7

[David Beazley]

David Beazley <dave at dabeaz.com> added the comment:

Sorry, but I don't see how you can say that the round-robin GIL and the legacy GIL have the same behavior based solely on the result of a performance benchmark.   Do you have any kind of thread scheduling trace that proves they are scheduling threads in exactly the same manner?   Maybe they both have lousy performance, but for different reasons.

----------

_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue8299>
_______________________________________