[issue2292] Missing *-unpacking generalizations
Guido van Rossum
report at bugs.python.org
Fri May 29 22:52:33 CEST 2009
Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> added the comment:
> I was hoping this would make 3.1. Too late, I guess. What about 3.2?
Here's what I said before:
"""
I think we should either get this into the 3.0a5 release planned for May
7, or wait for 3.1. I'd prefer to see some kind of PEP discussion on
the python-3000 list, rather than just a BDFL approval in a tracker
issue. I think it's a useful feature (especially now we already have
PEP 3132) but we're getting close to the release, so I'd like to see
some more eyeballs on this code... I expect the PEP discussion will be
short and sweet -- either most folks like it, or we should not push
through at this point in time.
"""
I still think this is the way to do it. I'm +0 myself. We might decide
not to do it just because py3k needs stability more than it needs more
features.
----------
_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue2292>
_______________________________________
More information about the Python-bugs-list
mailing list