[issue5076] bdist_wininst fails on py3k

[Mark Hammond]

Mark Hammond <mhammond at users.sourceforge.net> added the comment:

> Is it really useful to be have the same stub for 2.x and 3.x? 
> I think it would be better if they mutually ignore each 
> other, and be different.

Good question!  I'm not really aware of the complexities involved in
merging between the various branches, but given the fairly trivial
nature of the patch I figured there were potential advantages in both
identical source and stubs.  I'm happy to work the patch into either
#ifdef based (ie, identical source, different stubs), or "unconditional"
(both source and stubs different) if you prefer - and if so, which of
those 2 do you prefer?

On a related note, its obviously true that the same final installer will
not be able to be shared between 2.x and 3.x, as is currently possible
between pure-python installers between the 2.x series.  However, this
could be addressed in .py code at a later time while still allowing the
same stub to be shared if that is desirable.

_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue5076>
_______________________________________