[issue4064] distutils.util.get_platform() is wrong for universal builds on macosx

[Martin v. Löwis]

Martin v. Löwis <martin at v.loewis.de> added the comment:

> It is not documented anywhere but in the code

These also appear in file names of bdist commands, right? So I think it
should be documented.

> We (Bob Ippolitto and I) had some discussion about the architecture  
> strings when
> we were working on support for universal binaries and rejected my  
> initial suggestion
> of using "i386,ppc" instead of "fat" because that would be unwieldy.

OK. I wonder how you will call fat 64-bit binaries (i.e. ppc64 and
amd64), but I can live with that semantics as long as it's documented
(I actually question that it is documented in the code. If somebody
would put "-arch Itanium" in her CFLAGS, which might be supported in
10.9, it would infer that the architecture is "fat").

_______________________________________
Python tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue4064>
_______________________________________