[issue1621] Do not assume signed integer overflow behavior
Ismail Donmez
report at bugs.python.org
Fri Jan 18 19:27:53 CET 2008
Ismail Donmez added the comment:
-Wstrict-overflow=5 is not valid afaik its 1-3, 3 for most verbose also
you need a recent gcc 4.3 snapshot for best results, check your
distribution for gcc-snapshot package.
About the -Wall thing it seems to be a gcc bug, but for now workaround
is easy :-)
Regards,
ismail
__________________________________
Tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1621>
__________________________________
More information about the Python-bugs-list
mailing list