[issue1657] [patch] select.epoll wrapper for Linux 2.6 epoll()

[Thomas Herve]

Thomas Herve added the comment:

Cool, thanks for working on that. Just for the record, I don't really
understand the workflow: why closing the other ticket as duplicate and
not  post the patch on the old one? But whatever.

For this patch, I don't see the benefit of putting it in the select
module, instead of a separate module. Is there a specific reason?

Looking at the code, I don't have many remarks. pyepoll_new may leak if
epoll_create fails. I think that allowing threading around epoll_ctl is
useless, but I may be wrong.

Thanks again for working on it.

----------
nosy: +therve

__________________________________
Tracker <report at bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue1657>
__________________________________