[ python-Bugs-1560327 ] copy() method of dictionaries is not "deep"
SourceForge.net
noreply at sourceforge.net
Mon Sep 18 20:53:49 CEST 2006
Bugs item #1560327, was opened at 2006-09-17 20:35
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by gbrandl
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=105470&aid=1560327&group_id=5470
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: Python Interpreter Core
Group: Python 2.4
>Status: Open
>Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: daniel hahler (blueyed)
>Assigned to: A.M. Kuchling (akuchling)
Summary: copy() method of dictionaries is not "deep"
Initial Comment:
Unlike copy.deepcopy() the copy() method of a
dictionary does not copy objects in the dict, but
seem to use them by reference.
I'm not sure, if this is really a bug - but I would
have expected it to behave like copy.deepcopy(),
according to
http://www.python.org/infogami-faq/programming/how-do-i-copy-an-object-in-python/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>Comment By: Georg Brandl (gbrandl)
Date: 2006-09-18 18:53
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=849994
Sorry, I can't since I don't have any privileges there too.
Assigning to AMK, perhaps he can do something about it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: daniel hahler (blueyed)
Date: 2006-09-18 18:39
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=663176
I cannot comment on infogami. It says the following is
spam:
"""
Please note that olddict.copy() does not "deepcopy" the
dictionary.
So if you have a dictionary of objects, those will still
be copied by reference.
"""
I've tried rephrasing it slightly, to no avail. Can you
update the wiki page directly?
Thanks.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Georg Brandl (gbrandl)
Date: 2006-09-18 17:49
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=849994
Sure, if you like...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: daniel hahler (blueyed)
Date: 2006-09-18 17:26
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=663176
So it's not a bug?
Then please change the "Resolution" accordingly.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Georg Brandl (gbrandl)
Date: 2006-09-18 07:23
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=849994
The infogami FAQ is "interactive", so if you find the text
misleading, please add a comment yourself via the "add
comment" link. (You may have to login to infogami to do that.)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=105470&aid=1560327&group_id=5470
More information about the Python-bugs-list
mailing list