[ python-Bugs-1484556 ] Output of KlocWork on Python2.4.3 sources

[SourceForge.net]

Bugs item #1484556, was opened at 2006-05-09 03:14
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by nnorwitz
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=105470&aid=1484556&group_id=5470

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: Python Interpreter Core
Group: Python 2.4
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Miki Tebeka (tebeka)
Assigned to: Neal Norwitz (nnorwitz)
Summary: Output of KlocWork on Python2.4.3 sources

Initial Comment:
We're evaluating KlocWork (http://www.klocwork.com),
I've ran it on the source of Python 2.4.3 and the
output is attached (1562 warnings).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Neal Norwitz (nnorwitz)
Date: 2006-10-03 22:02

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=33168

Right, all the important changes have been fixed AFAIK. 
There might be a few that slipped through, but we are in
good enough shape.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Martin v. Löwis (loewis)
Date: 2006-10-03 05:02

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=21627

Ok, let's close this report, then. We continue to monitor
Klocwork, regardless.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Miki Tebeka (tebeka)
Date: 2006-10-03 01:24

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=358087

I don't know, currently KlocWork is way down in my "todo"
list :(

Looks like I won't be able to continue in this matter any
longer, if anyone else want to give a hand ...

Miki

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Georg Brandl (gbrandl)
Date: 2006-09-30 04:34

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=849994

Have all KlocWork issues been fixed now, Neal?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Miki Tebeka (tebeka)
Date: 2006-06-04 02:53

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=358087

I'll try to see if I can sneak it in, can't promise anything
though

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: A.M. Kuchling (akuchling)
Date: 2006-05-31 07:26

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=11375

The Coverity scans also probably report some of the same
bugs, so many of these problems may be fixed in the 2.5 trunk.  

If you're still evaluating, you could try running the tool
on the 2.5 trunk (snapshot available from
http://svn.python.org/snapshots/) and see if the results are
shorter.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Martin v. Löwis (loewis)
Date: 2006-05-09 21:45

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=21627

Thanks for these results. Unfortunately, they seem to
contain many false positives, so it is unclear how one
should proceed with them.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=105470&aid=1484556&group_id=5470