[ python-Bugs-1390321 ] Building without C++ should not fail.

SourceForge.net noreply at sourceforge.net
Wed May 10 06:33:57 CEST 2006


Bugs item #1390321, was opened at 2005-12-26 05:11
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by loewis
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=105470&aid=1390321&group_id=5470

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: Build
Group: Python 2.5
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Aahz (aahz)
Assigned to: Martin v. Löwis (loewis)
Summary: Building without C++ should not fail.

Initial Comment:
This just verified against HEAD:

./configure fails on Linux without g++ installed unless --without-cxx
given.  README should mention this.  Error is 

checking for C++ compiler default output file name... configure: error: C++ compiler cannot create executables

Inside config.log it says:

gcc: installation problem, cannot exec 'cc1plus': No such file or directory

(There's been some discussion about not requiring C++ installation by
default -- until that's settled, we should at least update the README.)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Martin v. Löwis (loewis)
Date: 2006-05-10 06:33

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=21627

This should be fixed in the trunk now. For 2.4, I added
documentation to README in r45946.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Fred L. Drake, Jr. (fdrake)
Date: 2006-04-06 02:31

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=3066

The group notes this is for Python 2.5, but I think it
applies to 2.4.x as well.

Re-categorizing as a build issue since Martin says it is.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Martin v. Löwis (loewis)
Date: 2005-12-28 01:03

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=21627

The real solution to this problem is that configure
shouldn't fail.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=105470&aid=1390321&group_id=5470


More information about the Python-bugs-list mailing list