[ python-Feature Requests-1322308 ] itemgetter built-in?

SourceForge.net noreply at sourceforge.net
Tue Oct 11 11:17:33 CEST 2005


Feature Requests item #1322308, was opened at 2005-10-10 04:56
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by capnstabn
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=355470&aid=1322308&group_id=5470

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: capnSTABN (capnstabn)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: itemgetter built-in?

Initial Comment:
uhm... operator.itemgetter() is useful and all, but fairly 
retarded looking for how simple it is

basically what i am wrestling with at the moment is 
doing some regular expressions without completely 
ganking the crap out of the code to make it work, since 
every freakin thing in re returns None all over the bloody 
place like regular expressions were hitting a ragging 
pinata with a chainsaw

after a LOT of muckymuck, basically six hours straight, 
the simplest non-conditional form i could come up with 
was this:

<a href="http://42.vg/81691" 
target="_new">http://42.vg/81691</a>

http://42.vg/81691

any comments would be leet!


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: capnSTABN (capnstabn)
Date: 2005-10-11 04:17

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=1126596

my request for enhancement is either a built-in version of 
operation.itemgetter() or an alteration of the behavior of re 
matches, i'm assuming the matter is up for debate so i wasn't 
being specific.

this issue has nothing to do with showing code and i find your 
followup to be completely off topic!

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Reinhold Birkenfeld (birkenfeld)
Date: 2005-10-10 11:57

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=1188172

Please tell us what your request for enhancement is or I'm
going to close this as Invalid.

Sorry I'm not showing more respect for your writing
abilities :-), but if you want to show code around, do it on
comp.lang.python please.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=355470&aid=1322308&group_id=5470


More information about the Python-bugs-list mailing list