[Python-bugs-list] [ python-Bugs-227699 ] Memory leaks using imp.load_module

noreply@sourceforge.net noreply@sourceforge.net
Thu, 18 Oct 2001 15:30:54 -0700


Bugs item #227699, was opened at 2001-01-05 12:30
You can respond by visiting: 
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=105470&aid=227699&group_id=5470

Category: Python Interpreter Core
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Charles G Waldman (cgw)
Assigned to: Barry Warsaw (bwarsaw)
Summary: Memory leaks using imp.load_module

Initial Comment:
#!/usr/bin/env python

import os
import sys
import imp

print os.getpid()

sys.path.append("/tmp")

count = 0

while (count<1000):
    modname = "testmod%s" % count
    count = count + 1

    filename = '/tmp/'  + modname + '.py'
    f  = open(filename, 'w')
    for x in range(10000):
        f.write('x%s=%s\n'%(x,x))
    f.close()
    
    modinfo = imp.find_module(modname)
    print 'loading', modname
    m = apply(imp.load_module, ('testmod',) + modinfo)
    
## run "watch -n 1 ps up <pid>
## where <pid> is the pid printed out by this program
    


----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Barry Warsaw (bwarsaw)
Date: 2001-10-18 15:30

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=12800

I'm having a hard time tracking down the leak.  I don't
believe it's at the C layer since preliminary Insure runs
don't indicate any leaked blocks (there are plenty of inuse
blocks, but those generally don't count).

I will note that if you comment out the imp.load_module call
the memory usage remains constant.

Loading each module though is going to naturally consume
more memory, right?  And those loaded modules aren't ever
going to get freed, at least without mucking about in
sys.modules.  The memory consumption with ps is pretty
meager, so I suspect we don't have a valid leak here, but
just normal memory consumption due to importation of 10k
modules.

I'm running a more detailed insure run right now just to be
sure, but I'm skeptical that there's really a bug here.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Barry Warsaw (bwarsaw)
Date: 2001-02-23 11:53

Message:
I can verify that memory grows with this process.  I will run it under insure to get more information.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Guido van Rossum (gvanrossum)
Date: 2001-01-18 19:43

Message:
Barry...?!?!

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Fred L. Drake, Jr. (fdrake)
Date: 2001-01-07 15:32

Message:
Assigned to Barry since he's the memory leak expert (& has the right tools).

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=105470&aid=227699&group_id=5470