[Python-3000-checkins] r65620 - python/branches/py3k

Brett Cannon brett at python.org
Sun Aug 10 07:12:51 CEST 2008


On Sat, Aug 9, 2008 at 7:21 PM, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote:
> Benjamin Peterson wrote:
>>
>> Brett,
>> You know that you can block multiply revisions at the same time,
>> right? It seems you are now blocking each revision separately.
>

Yes, I do, but I don't mind. It's two commands with a copy-and-paste
that occurs while I am doing other stuff.

> Sometimes its useful to do one task completely (fix in 2.6, commit, block in
> 3.0, commit) to make sure you don't miss anything, rather than save all the
> block commands up to the end.
>
> This also keeps the source tree is as consistent a state as possible, so it
> doesn't matter if Brett gets interrupted while working on his next fix and
> someone does an svnmerge before he gets back to it.
>

Exactly what Nick said. I treat each fix as an atomic commit that
happens to span to branches in svn. That way I never forget anything.
Plus I have actually been committing when someone else was doing a
large merge into Py3K, so this helps prevent all of my commits from
suddenly causing someone else grief.

-Brett


More information about the Python-3000-checkins mailing list