From matti.picus at gmail.com  Sun Sep  8 03:44:47 2019
From: matti.picus at gmail.com (Matti Picus)
Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2019 09:44:47 +0200
Subject: [pypy-dev] Time to start a release cycle?
Message-ID: <a55488f3-26a1-7f03-840b-9b8983c1097e@gmail.com>

An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/pypy-dev/attachments/20190908/bf89a409/attachment.html>

From acoimbra97 at gmail.com  Thu Sep 12 18:10:51 2019
From: acoimbra97 at gmail.com (Arthur Coimbra)
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2019 19:10:51 -0300
Subject: [pypy-dev] Package Installation
Message-ID: <CAEHFtrPFUq++v0U9Rc32NoNN8URYLCVvRE-AYYbMJmU1Jra0uA@mail.gmail.com>

Hello pypy team,

I'm not sure if I'm installing packages for pypy correctly as I can't solve
the following issue:
[image: image.png]

Any help would be much appreciated.

Best regards,
Arthur
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/pypy-dev/attachments/20190912/8d4039c7/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image.png
Type: image/png
Size: 40826 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/pypy-dev/attachments/20190912/8d4039c7/attachment-0001.png>

From matti.picus at gmail.com  Fri Sep 13 16:06:38 2019
From: matti.picus at gmail.com (matti picus)
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2019 23:06:38 +0300
Subject: [pypy-dev] Package Installation
In-Reply-To: <CAEHFtrPFUq++v0U9Rc32NoNN8URYLCVvRE-AYYbMJmU1Jra0uA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAEHFtrPFUq++v0U9Rc32NoNN8URYLCVvRE-AYYbMJmU1Jra0uA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAO8bCgiAOuNM776s5Xp7k_gTjSKcUqKPGwVCT7P7XhO8JGWZjg@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, 13 Sep 2019 at 5:45 pm, Arthur Coimbra <acoimbra97 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello pypy team,
>
> I'm not sure if I'm installing packages for pypy correctly as I can't
> solve the following issue:
>
>
> Any help would be much appreciated.
>
> Best regards,
> Arthur
> _______________________________________________
> pypy-dev mailing list
> pypy-dev at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev


Most open source mailing lists and issue trackers prefer text copy-paste
rather than console screen shots.

With that being said, did you run ?pypy -mensurepip??
What version of PyPy?
Matti
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/pypy-dev/attachments/20190913/d461fcd4/attachment.html>

From matti.picus at gmail.com  Fri Sep 13 16:09:25 2019
From: matti.picus at gmail.com (matti picus)
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2019 23:09:25 +0300
Subject: [pypy-dev] Package Installation
In-Reply-To: <CAO8bCgiAOuNM776s5Xp7k_gTjSKcUqKPGwVCT7P7XhO8JGWZjg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAEHFtrPFUq++v0U9Rc32NoNN8URYLCVvRE-AYYbMJmU1Jra0uA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAO8bCgiAOuNM776s5Xp7k_gTjSKcUqKPGwVCT7P7XhO8JGWZjg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAO8bCghe7n4wcgABU1CBY8wU8-Vx4hAApAswPXpN3ARkdH1qFA@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, 13 Sep 2019 at 11:06 pm, matti picus <matti.picus at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, 13 Sep 2019 at 5:45 pm, Arthur Coimbra <acoimbra97 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hello pypy team,
>>
>> I'm not sure if I'm installing packages for pypy correctly as I can't
>> solve the following issue:
>>
>>
>> Any help would be much appreciated.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Arthur
>> _______________________________________________
>> pypy-dev mailing list
>> pypy-dev at python.org
>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
>
>
> Most open source mailing lists and issue trackers prefer text copy-paste
> rather than console screen shots.
>
> With that being said, did you run ?pypy -mensurepip??
> What version of PyPy?
> Matti
>
Hang on, you are using pip from cpython. That won?t work. Something is
setting your sys.path either an environment variable or a startup script.
Matti
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/pypy-dev/attachments/20190913/5cb093dd/attachment.html>

From sapna.ds at gmail.com  Wed Sep 18 16:06:15 2019
From: sapna.ds at gmail.com (Sapna D'Souza)
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2019 13:06:15 -0700
Subject: [pypy-dev] Linux x86-64 binary (64bit,
 built on Ubuntu 14.04) - much slower implementation warning
Message-ID: <CAFG5uakrFyT0gu8eLyJ11rwQHN_gTC6fvyowXnY+zrixPpTbMA@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

I am benchmarking python vs pypy and tried running my code using Linux
x86-64 binary (64bit, built on Ubuntu 14.04)
<https://bitbucket.org/pypy/pypy/downloads/pypy3.6-v7.1.1-linux64.tar.bz2>
from the downloads section of pypy.org

I observe the following when I execute my scripts:

much slower implementation (libssl.so.1.0.0: cannot open shared object
file: No such file or directory)


Can someone let me know if there is a way to get past this or if this will
be fixed in an upcoming release? I am seeing the run time more than double
when compared to regular python with this version.


Thanks,

Luna
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/pypy-dev/attachments/20190918/05c795c7/attachment.html>

From matti.picus at gmail.com  Thu Sep 19 07:12:00 2019
From: matti.picus at gmail.com (Matti Picus)
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2019 14:12:00 +0300
Subject: [pypy-dev] Linux x86-64 binary (64bit,
 built on Ubuntu 14.04) - much slower implementation warning
In-Reply-To: <CAFG5uakrFyT0gu8eLyJ11rwQHN_gTC6fvyowXnY+zrixPpTbMA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAFG5uakrFyT0gu8eLyJ11rwQHN_gTC6fvyowXnY+zrixPpTbMA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <79915589-4640-eb57-d5f7-a6c928cf6b7f@gmail.com>

On 18/9/19 11:06 pm, Sapna D'Souza wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am benchmarking python vs pypy and tried running my code using Linux 
> x86-64 binary (64bit, built on Ubuntu 14.04) 
> <https://bitbucket.org/pypy/pypy/downloads/pypy3.6-v7.1.1-linux64.tar.bz2>from 
> the downloads section of pypy.org <http://pypy.org>
>
> I observe the following when I execute my scripts:
>
> much slower implementation (libssl.so.1.0.0: cannot open shared object 
> file: No such file or directory)
>
>
> Can someone let me know if there is a way to get past this or if this 
> will be fixed in an upcoming release? I am seeing the run time more 
> than double when compared to regular python with this version.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Luna
>
>

I think part of your message was cut off. Did it say something like "The 
_hashlib module is not available, falling back to a much slower 
implementation"?

If this is the case, the pypy you downloaded is not compatible with your 
platform. You may have better luck if you download a portable PyPy from 
https://github.com/squeaky-pl/portable-pypy.


If you can show us your code perhaps we can give you some pointers.


Matti


From matti.picus at gmail.com  Tue Sep 24 01:46:36 2019
From: matti.picus at gmail.com (Matti Picus)
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 08:46:36 +0300
Subject: [pypy-dev] Testing recent changes to JSON decoding
Message-ID: <973b7ac3-beb8-928f-7928-29a2711c28fc@gmail.com>

Carl recently merged a deep change to the JSON decoding code (thanks!!). 
I would like to add it to the upcoming release. If you have an 
interesting JSON file, maybe even some broken ones that exist in the 
wild, could you give a latest nightly default (python2) or py3.6 a spin? 
In addition to knowing that the code works, it would be nice to hear how 
much speedup it gives.


Thanks,

Matti


From pierre.augier at univ-grenoble-alpes.fr  Mon Sep 30 15:25:29 2019
From: pierre.augier at univ-grenoble-alpes.fr (PIERRE AUGIER)
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2019 21:25:29 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [pypy-dev] Migration from Bitbucket to ???
Message-ID: <427264973.24684183.1569871529602.JavaMail.zimbra@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr>

Hi,

I posted this message in https://bitbucket.org/pypy/pypy/issues/3082 but apparently, it's better to post it in this list, so here it is:

As explained here https://bitbucket.org/blog/sunsetting-mercurial-support-in-bitbucket, Mercurial features and repositories will be officially removed from Bitbucket and its API on June 1, 2020.

I guess you thought about what to do for PyPy repository and PyPy development.

I am also a Mercurial user and I am facing the same problem for some repositories. Thus, I am very interested to know what you plan to do.

In particular, I am looking for a good forge for the Transonic project (https://transonic.readthedocs.io), which by the way is compatible with PyPy3.6 (currently only the nightly builds) and could help a wider adoption of PyPy3 for projects using the Python scientific stack (just by accelerating the numerical kernels using Numpy and let PyPy accelerate pure Python code).

I follow the Heptapod project https://heptapod.net/ (a friendly fork of GitLab to bring very good Mercurial support). It seems to me that it starts to be nearly production ready and that it would nicely fit your workflow with Mercurial.

Of course, it would be very convenient if a common instance (free to use for simple users until a certain point) could be setup (something somehow similar to Github, but with Mercurial support). Even for PyPy, it would be good in terms of visibility.

I also heard that your repository would have to be fixed to be able to use Heptapod.

What is the current status of these issues for PyPy? Have you already decided what to do?

Best regards,
Pierre

--
Pierre Augier - CR CNRS                 http://www.legi.grenoble-inp.fr
LEGI (UMR 5519) Laboratoire des Ecoulements Geophysiques et Industriels
BP53, 38041 Grenoble Cedex, France                tel:+33.4.56.52.86.16