[pypy-dev] Strange annotation problem.
Maciek Fijalkowski
fijal at genesilico.pl
Mon Jul 23 12:02:29 CEST 2007
Amaury Forgeot d'Arc wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Maciek Fijalkowski wrote:
>> Discovered by exarkun. following diff breaks translation
>>
>> :.
>>
>>
>> Index: ../../module/posix/__init__.py
>> ===================================================================
>> --- ../../module/posix/__init__.py (revision 45246)
>> +++ ../../module/posix/__init__.py (working copy)
>> @@ -83,6 +83,9 @@
>> # interpleveldefs['uname'] = 'interp_posix.uname'
>> if hasattr(os, 'ttyname'):
>> interpleveldefs['ttyname'] = 'interp_posix.ttyname'
>> + if hasattr(os, 'setsid'):
>> + interpleveldefs['xxx'] = 'interp_posix.xxx'
>> +
>> for name in w_star:
>> if hasattr(os, name):
>> interpleveldefs[name] = 'interp_posix.' + name
>> Index: ../../module/posix/interp_posix.py
>> ===================================================================
>> --- ../../module/posix/interp_posix.py (revision 45246)
>> +++ ../../module/posix/interp_posix.py (working copy)
>> @@ -499,6 +499,22 @@
>> raise OperationError(space.w_TypeError, space.wrap(msg))
>> utime.unwrap_spec = [ObjSpace, str, W_Root]
>>
>> +def xxx(space):
>> + """xxx() -> pid
>> +
>> + Stuff
>> + """
>> + return 3
>> +xxx.unwrap_spec = [ObjSpace]
>> +
>
> The function seems to return an unwrapped object.
> does it behave better if you replace the return value with
> something like space.wrap(3) ?
>
Hum. Good point :-) I must be sleeping again...
Cheers,
fijal
:.
More information about the Pypy-dev
mailing list