[pypy-svn] rev 1717 - pypy/trunk/doc/funding

[pedronis at codespeak.net]

Author: pedronis
Date: Sat Oct 11 15:42:38 2003
New Revision: 1717

Modified:
   pypy/trunk/doc/funding/B0.1_summary.txt
   pypy/trunk/doc/funding/FIXME
Log:
removed garbage from Summary up to unfinished parts
more detailed update of related FIXMEs


Modified: pypy/trunk/doc/funding/B0.1_summary.txt
==============================================================================
--- pypy/trunk/doc/funding/B0.1_summary.txt	(original)
+++ pypy/trunk/doc/funding/B0.1_summary.txt	Sat Oct 11 15:42:38 2003
@@ -1,11 +1,3 @@
-:DELETE:BEGIN
-
-Proposal Summary Page
-=======================
-
--- we create this header in the document, so it doesn't appear here.
-
-:DELETE:END
 
 **Proposal full title:**
 	 
@@ -36,18 +28,10 @@
      benefit.  The Python Business Forum, a non-profit Trade organisation
      of FIXME WHAT IS THE JABBER -- SIGNIFICANT PYTHON is poised
      to take advantage of this new development.
+     FIXME_LAURA FIXME_BEA ADD COMMUNICATION STRATEGIC OBJ
 
-FIXME_LAURA FIXME_BEA ADD COMMUNICATION STRATEGIC OBJ
 **Proposal abstract:**
 
-:DELETE:BEGIN
-
-copied from Part A 
-
-(Actually, we will paste this one INTO Part A)
-
-:DELETE:END
-
   Main goals
 
     The main goal is to use innovative implementation techniques and
@@ -91,7 +75,17 @@
     any other language than Python. They will, instead, be able to
     concentrate on getting their job done.
 
-FIXME_NICO FIXME_LAURAF check this
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
 
 
 

Modified: pypy/trunk/doc/funding/FIXME
==============================================================================
--- pypy/trunk/doc/funding/FIXME	(original)
+++ pypy/trunk/doc/funding/FIXME	Sat Oct 11 15:42:38 2003
@@ -12,8 +12,19 @@
 NOT STARTED
 
 B0.1_summary
+Check Full Title, do we want this way
+Finish, polish Strategic Objectives
+
 Retouch Alistair's Abstract (see pypy-funding comments)
-Remove garbage
+ - maybe mention sprints in the abstract? agile methodologies? 
+ - >     The project will achieve its goals principally by building on the
+   >     strengths of the current open source developer community.
+
+  i am probably too sensitive here but this doesn't seem to imply 
+  that we are *part* of the open-source developer community.  Many
+  companies have tried to "exploit" the open-source dev-community. 
+  we don't want that. we want to contribute, connect and integrate. 
+
 Review
 NOT STARTED