[pydotorg-www] Code of Conduct for wiki usage?

M.-A. Lemburg mal at python.org
Sat May 4 06:00:23 EDT 2019


Hi Chris,

the PSF CoC applies to the wiki as well, but I'm not sure I follow
your comments regarding the page in question.

This is the version of the page you edited:

https://wiki.python.org/moin/DocumentationTools?action=recall&rev=41

It simply says that the package is a maintained fork. I could not find
language which suggests that pdoc3 is better than the original and
it's certainly not offensive in any way.

Could you please clarify ?

Thanks,
-- 
Marc-Andre Lemburg
Python Software Foundation
http://www.python.org/psf/
http://www.malemburg.com/



On 04.05.2019 07:35, Chris Angelico wrote:
> Does the main Python COC apply to pages on the wiki? If not, is there
> some approximate equivalent that all wiki editors are bound to comply
> with? I can't find anything specified.
> 
> The page in question is one that has been the focus of some discussion already:
> https://wiki.python.org/moin/DocumentationTools
> 
> The pdoc3 fork is technically legal, but is offensive in a number of ways:
> * The wiki entry (until I edited it just now) implied heavily that
> this was the sole fork worth considering
> * The documentation at https://pdoc3.github.io/pdoc/ deliberately and
> gratuitously sneaks swastikas into the content
> * The "What Users Are Saying" section may (unproven) be using quotes
> not from users of the software, which (if true) would be
> misrepresenting those people
> * The overall tone of the page tends towards the caustic and divisive.
> 
> I'm not comfortable with the project in its current state, but am
> unsure what, if any, rules have been violated. Seeking advice.
> 
> ChrisA
> _______________________________________________
> pydotorg-www mailing list
> pydotorg-www at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pydotorg-www
> 




More information about the pydotorg-www mailing list