[Patches] [ python-Patches-408627 ] frame.lookup_name

[noreply@sourceforge.net]

Patches item #408627, was updated on 2001-03-14 15:02
You can respond by visiting: 
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=305470&aid=408627&group_id=5470

Category: core (C code)
Group: None
>Status: Closed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jeremy Hylton (jhylton)
Assigned to: Jeremy Hylton (jhylton)
Summary: frame.lookup_name

Initial Comment:
This method implements the functionality you want for
string interpolation: given a frame, return the value
that name is bound to in the frame's environment. 
Works for free variables.



----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Jeremy Hylton (jhylton)
Date: 2001-03-19 12:33

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=31392

We decided to scrap this approach, because it does a linear
search over the names in the code object to figure out the
right scope.  If you look up all the names, this has
quadratic cost.

Instead, we'll create a dictionary with all the name
bindings.


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Ka-Ping Yee (ping)
Date: 2001-03-14 21:53

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=45338

I hate SourceForge.  It just took three or four tries,
reloading various pages on the looong path between the
login screen and the patch detail screen, to convince
it that i was logged in.

Anyway, here's what i wanted to say: lookup() would be
a fine name for a method, but then again, why not just
use mp_subscript?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Barry Warsaw (bwarsaw)
Date: 2001-03-14 19:48

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=12800

Certainly seems to do what I want, thanks.  Three questions,
probably for the BDFL:

- is lookup_name() the best name for the method?  The
  underscore is a little ugly to me.

- should lookup_name() take an optional failobj, a la 
  dict.get() which, if provided and the name is missing
  returns failobj instead of raising NameError?  NameError
  is fine if failobj is omitted.

- does it make sense to be able to find out where a name
  was found, i.e. in which scope?  I can't think of a
  particular use for this, but the API might be for 
  frame.which_scope(name) to return an integer which
  signifies how many lexical scopes up the name was found.
  e.g. 0 == locals, 1 == immediately nested scope and
  so on.  Maybe special value -1 means global.  
  Ah, on second thought, that seems more confusing than
  necessary.

Assigning back to Jeremy.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=305470&aid=408627&group_id=5470