[Patches] [Patch #103899] Remove modules configured in Setup

noreply@sourceforge.net noreply@sourceforge.net
Fri, 23 Feb 2001 08:33:07 -0800


Patch #103899 has been updated. 

Project: python
Category: distutils
Status: Closed
Submitted by: akuchling
Assigned to : akuchling
Summary: Remove modules configured in Setup

Follow-Ups:

Date: 2001-Feb-23 08:33
By: akuchling

Comment:
Checked in to revision 1.30 of setup.py.

-------------------------------------------------------

Date: 2001-Feb-23 03:55
By: theller

Comment:
Yes, this look much better!
-------------------------------------------------------

Date: 2001-Feb-21 20:08
By: akuchling

Comment:
This takes a much simpler approach; if  a module is in Modules/Setup, don't
compile it.  Then you can set flags to yours heart's content  in Setup, and
you can sing and jump and dance about and the little goat-footed balloon
man will... sorry.




-------------------------------------------------------

Date: 2001-Feb-21 12:24
By: akuchling

Comment:
Setup.dist, you're thinking of, but yes, you've got the right idea.
-------------------------------------------------------

Date: 2001-Feb-21 12:21
By: theller

Comment:
Shouldn't Modules/Setup be hacked or recreated from Setup.in in this case
(although I'm not at all familiar with this stuff)
-------------------------------------------------------

Date: 2001-Feb-21 12:18
By: akuchling

Comment:
It's needed to handle special-cases; what if GDBM is installed in
/depot/gnu/ instead of either 

OTOH, maybe this fixes the wrong problem.  If the setup.py 
script parsed Modules/Setup and ignored any modules turned on in that file,
that might be much easier that having a bunch of switches.  Hm...


-------------------------------------------------------

Date: 2001-Feb-21 12:15
By: theller

Comment:
The previous one was my comment, but I wasn't logged in. sorry.
-------------------------------------------------------

Date: 2001-Feb-21 12:13
By: nobody

Comment:
Looks as if it could work, but I only can say this from reading the
patch.

But: Why is it neccessary? Why aren't the include-directories defined in
the Extension instances? Would anyone sane give them from the command line?
-------------------------------------------------------

Date: 2001-Feb-21 11:47
By: akuchling

Comment:
New version of the patch, this time as a context diff.
-------------------------------------------------------

Date: 2001-Feb-21 11:40
By: akuchling

Comment:
Reassigning to Thomas Heller (since he's done a fair bit of
Distutil hacking) for a sanity check.
-------------------------------------------------------

Date: 2001-Feb-20 07:34
By: akuchling

Comment:
Greg, can you please take a look at this in the next day or two?  If you
can't, let me know and I'll reassign it to someone else.
-------------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------------
For more info, visit:

http://sourceforge.net/patch/?func=detailpatch&patch_id=103899&group_id=5470