From wesmckinn at gmail.com Fri Oct 11 08:13:38 2013 From: wesmckinn at gmail.com (Wes McKinney) Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 23:13:38 -0700 Subject: [Pandas-dev] Timeline for 0.13 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 2:59 PM, Phillip Cloud wrote: > Issue-closing, bug-squashing and useful-feature-adding abound! Wes et al., > what sort of timeline did y'all have in mind for getting 0.13 out the door? > > -- > Best, > Phillip Cloud > > _______________________________________________ > Pandas-dev mailing list > Pandas-dev at python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pandas-dev > I don't have a rigid timeline in mind. I regret not being able to contribute very significantly to the release beyond occasional code review so appreciate all your guys' intense efforts. How are things looking 12 days later? It looks like there's still a couple weeks of work to do to get things settled down to a releasable state? - Wes From wesmckinn at gmail.com Sat Oct 12 00:19:14 2013 From: wesmckinn at gmail.com (Wes McKinney) Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 15:19:14 -0700 Subject: [Pandas-dev] Ohloh badge on pandas docs Message-ID: hi folks, I've gotten some reports about the animated Ohloh badge being a distraction to readers of the online pandas documentation. Any objections to just removing this (I don't have any)? Alternately, it could be changed to an Ohloh (ohloh.net/p/py-pandas) badge that isn't animated. Also fixed the docs build box today so should be NumPy 1.7 / scipy 0.12 functional now (let me know if there are any missing dependencies). - Wes From jeffreback at gmail.com Thu Oct 17 22:39:40 2013 From: jeffreback at gmail.com (Jeff Reback) Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 16:39:40 -0400 Subject: [Pandas-dev] Timeline for 0.13 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <6A8FF19A-843E-476E-AE26-585E933840BA@gmail.com> Ok....made decent progress since last week....18 issues left...lol Phillp and Jeff Tratner have a few issues to fix over the weekend going to merge the isin pretty soon wesm u ok with the offsets by cancan01? otherwise I think prob ok for a release candidate maybe early next week wesm can you put up the windows builds? thanks, Jefff On Oct 11, 2013, at 2:13 AM, Wes McKinney wrote: > >> On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 2:59 PM, Phillip Cloud wrote: >> Issue-closing, bug-squashing and useful-feature-adding abound! Wes et al., >> what sort of timeline did y'all have in mind for getting 0.13 out the door? >> >> -- >> Best, >> Phillip Cloud >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Pandas-dev mailing list >> Pandas-dev at python.org >> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pandas-dev > > I don't have a rigid timeline in mind. I regret not being able to > contribute very significantly to the release beyond occasional code > review so appreciate all your guys' intense efforts. How are things > looking 12 days later? It looks like there's still a couple weeks of > work to do to get things settled down to a releasable state? > > - Wes > _______________________________________________ > Pandas-dev mailing list > Pandas-dev at python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pandas-dev From wesmckinn at gmail.com Mon Oct 21 08:28:55 2013 From: wesmckinn at gmail.com (Wes McKinney) Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2013 23:28:55 -0700 Subject: [Pandas-dev] Timeline for 0.13 In-Reply-To: <6A8FF19A-843E-476E-AE26-585E933840BA@gmail.com> References: <6A8FF19A-843E-476E-AE26-585E933840BA@gmail.com> Message-ID: Sorry Jeff, been super crunched last couple weeks. I will have a look at the build machine tomorrow if possible to get the dev builds back up. On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 1:39 PM, Jeff Reback wrote: > Ok....made decent progress since last week....18 issues left...lol > > Phillp and Jeff Tratner have a few issues to fix over the weekend > > going to merge the isin pretty soon > > wesm u ok with the offsets by cancan01? > > otherwise I think prob ok for a release candidate maybe early next week > > wesm can you put up the windows builds? > > thanks, > > Jefff > > On Oct 11, 2013, at 2:13 AM, Wes McKinney wrote: >> >>> On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 2:59 PM, Phillip Cloud wrote: >>> Issue-closing, bug-squashing and useful-feature-adding abound! Wes et al., >>> what sort of timeline did y'all have in mind for getting 0.13 out the door? >>> >>> -- >>> Best, >>> Phillip Cloud >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Pandas-dev mailing list >>> Pandas-dev at python.org >>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pandas-dev >> >> I don't have a rigid timeline in mind. I regret not being able to >> contribute very significantly to the release beyond occasional code >> review so appreciate all your guys' intense efforts. How are things >> looking 12 days later? It looks like there's still a couple weeks of >> work to do to get things settled down to a releasable state? >> >> - Wes >> _______________________________________________ >> Pandas-dev mailing list >> Pandas-dev at python.org >> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pandas-dev From changshe at gmail.com Fri Oct 25 20:48:08 2013 From: changshe at gmail.com (Chang She) Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 11:48:08 -0700 Subject: [Pandas-dev] error building pandas docs Message-ID: Hey guys, I'm seeing the following errors when building the pandas docs. Please let me know if any of these indicate dependencies that need to be updated on my end. If this isn't a quick fix then I'm happy to file a github issue and we can keep track of the conversation there. https://gist.github.com/changhiskhan/7159686 https://gist.github.com/changhiskhan/7159772 https://gist.github.com/changhiskhan/7159783 Thanks! Chang -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: