[Pandas-dev] 0.11.1

Wes McKinney wesmckinn at gmail.com
Tue May 21 09:32:17 CEST 2013


On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Jeff Reback <jreback at yahoo.com> wrote:
> sounds good
> should these method be in
> pandas.io.json
>
> to avoid bloating the core methods?
>
>
> On May 20, 2013, at 2:51 PM, Wes McKinney <wesmckinn at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 4:57 AM, Jeff Reback <jeffreback at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> very little left in the issues space
>>>
>>> y-p?
>>> https://github.com/pydata/pandas/issues/3573
>>>
>>> a PR I think should be included
>>> https://github.com/pydata/pandas/pull/3649
>>>
>>> I think y-p has a couple as well
>>>
>>> a couple of issues for wesm:
>>> https://github.com/pydata/pandas/issues/3501
>>> https://github.com/pydata/pandas/issues/3453
>>>
>>> a to_csv issue about quoting
>>> https://github.com/pydata/pandas/issues/3503
>>>
>>> maybe...chang?
>>> https://github.com/pydata/pandas/issues/3634
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Pandas-dev mailing list
>>> Pandas-dev at python.org
>>> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pandas-dev
>>
>> Cool-- just moved these to 0.11.1 milestone. What do you think about
>> merging the JSON-back-from-the-dead code, right after 0.11.1?

I feel that JSON is an important enough serialization format (along
with CSV/TSV, definitely) to be core methods. What do you think?


More information about the Pandas-dev mailing list