From jreback at yahoo.com  Thu Jul  4 01:17:56 2013
From: jreback at yahoo.com (Jeff Reback)
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2013 19:17:56 -0400
Subject: [Pandas-dev] Fwd: [pandas] Windows automated builds not updated
	recently? (#4053)
References: <pydata/pandas/issues/4053/20451007@github.com>
Message-ID: <483BDD0E-2E8C-4985-899E-4D88ABA5F206@yahoo.com>

any luck on the windows builds?

hopefully can get some feedback from windows users on 0.12-dev

Begin forwarded message:

> From: Gagi <notifications at github.com>
> Date: July 3, 2013, 7:15:46 PM EDT
> To: pydata/pandas <pandas at noreply.github.com>
> Cc: jreback <jeff at reback.net>
> Subject: Re: [pandas] Windows automated builds not updated recently? (#4053)
> Reply-To: pydata/pandas <reply+i-16085374-ccb8a7fe7f13e69232c53d60467e6b4324c74832-953992 at reply.github.com>
> 
> I'm also patiently waiting on this one too. :)
> 
> ?
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/pandas-dev/attachments/20130703/11c75d73/attachment.html>

From changshe at gmail.com  Thu Jul  4 01:26:55 2013
From: changshe at gmail.com (Chang She)
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2013 16:26:55 -0700
Subject: [Pandas-dev] Fwd: [pandas] Windows automated builds not updated
 recently? (#4053)
In-Reply-To: <483BDD0E-2E8C-4985-899E-4D88ABA5F206@yahoo.com>
References: <pydata/pandas/issues/4053/20451007@github.com>
	<483BDD0E-2E8C-4985-899E-4D88ABA5F206@yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <CADwh0WN9Jf1D=uMYzMsFfJnRLTovpZvf4n=GkVNEosU1U1UJGA@mail.gmail.com>

I cleared up the hard drive and restarted the box last week.
I will check again in a bit


On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Jeff Reback <jreback at yahoo.com> wrote:

> any luck on the windows builds?
>
> hopefully can get some feedback from windows users on 0.12-dev
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> *From:* Gagi <notifications at github.com>
> *Date:* July 3, 2013, 7:15:46 PM EDT
> *To:* pydata/pandas <pandas at noreply.github.com>
> *Cc:* jreback <jeff at reback.net>
> *Subject:* *Re: [pandas] Windows automated builds not updated recently?
> (#4053)*
> *Reply-To:* pydata/pandas <
> reply+i-16085374-ccb8a7fe7f13e69232c53d60467e6b4324c74832-953992 at reply.github.com
> >
>
> I'm also patiently waiting on this one too. :)
>
> ?
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<https://github.com/pydata/pandas/issues/4053#issuecomment-20451007>
> .
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pandas-dev mailing list
> Pandas-dev at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pandas-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/pandas-dev/attachments/20130703/611cda9a/attachment.html>

From wesmckinn at gmail.com  Thu Jul  4 02:10:12 2013
From: wesmckinn at gmail.com (Wes McKinney)
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2013 17:10:12 -0700
Subject: [Pandas-dev] Fwd: [pandas] Windows automated builds not updated
 recently? (#4053)
In-Reply-To: <CADwh0WN9Jf1D=uMYzMsFfJnRLTovpZvf4n=GkVNEosU1U1UJGA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <pydata/pandas/issues/4053/20451007@github.com>
	<483BDD0E-2E8C-4985-899E-4D88ABA5F206@yahoo.com>
	<CADwh0WN9Jf1D=uMYzMsFfJnRLTovpZvf4n=GkVNEosU1U1UJGA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAJPUwMAh_ctVg83=7G8kfLKiRjL4Ef6kMLdzxiCH8GqppcR04Q@mail.gmail.com>

We also need to upgrade the environments to NumPy 1.7.x

On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 4:26 PM, Chang She <changshe at gmail.com> wrote:

> I cleared up the hard drive and restarted the box last week.
> I will check again in a bit
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Jeff Reback <jreback at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> any luck on the windows builds?
>>
>> hopefully can get some feedback from windows users on 0.12-dev
>>
>> Begin forwarded message:
>>
>> *From:* Gagi <notifications at github.com>
>> *Date:* July 3, 2013, 7:15:46 PM EDT
>> *To:* pydata/pandas <pandas at noreply.github.com>
>> *Cc:* jreback <jeff at reback.net>
>> *Subject:* *Re: [pandas] Windows automated builds not updated recently?
>> (#4053)*
>> *Reply-To:* pydata/pandas <
>> reply+i-16085374-ccb8a7fe7f13e69232c53d60467e6b4324c74832-953992 at reply.github.com
>> >
>>
>> I'm also patiently waiting on this one too. :)
>>
>> ?
>> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<https://github.com/pydata/pandas/issues/4053#issuecomment-20451007>
>> .
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pandas-dev mailing list
>> Pandas-dev at python.org
>> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pandas-dev
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pandas-dev mailing list
> Pandas-dev at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pandas-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/pandas-dev/attachments/20130703/b063d897/attachment.html>

From changshe at gmail.com  Thu Jul  4 03:58:55 2013
From: changshe at gmail.com (Chang She)
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2013 18:58:55 -0700
Subject: [Pandas-dev] Fwd: [pandas] Windows automated builds not updated
 recently? (#4053)
In-Reply-To: <CAJPUwMAh_ctVg83=7G8kfLKiRjL4Ef6kMLdzxiCH8GqppcR04Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <pydata/pandas/issues/4053/20451007@github.com>
	<483BDD0E-2E8C-4985-899E-4D88ABA5F206@yahoo.com>
	<CADwh0WN9Jf1D=uMYzMsFfJnRLTovpZvf4n=GkVNEosU1U1UJGA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJPUwMAh_ctVg83=7G8kfLKiRjL4Ef6kMLdzxiCH8GqppcR04Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CADwh0WN04nZEbRB2bVLtkkAdT0QoVR6HBRYp0-01CRK7Gq34-g@mail.gmail.com>

some test failures:

https://github.com/pydata/pandas/issues/4122

wrt NumPy 1.7.x, should we get another box so we can run both 1.6 and 1.7?
Should we consider using windows azure or something?


On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 5:10 PM, Wes McKinney <wesmckinn at gmail.com> wrote:

> We also need to upgrade the environments to NumPy 1.7.x
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 4:26 PM, Chang She <changshe at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I cleared up the hard drive and restarted the box last week.
>> I will check again in a bit
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Jeff Reback <jreback at yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>> any luck on the windows builds?
>>>
>>> hopefully can get some feedback from windows users on 0.12-dev
>>>
>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>>
>>> *From:* Gagi <notifications at github.com>
>>> *Date:* July 3, 2013, 7:15:46 PM EDT
>>> *To:* pydata/pandas <pandas at noreply.github.com>
>>> *Cc:* jreback <jeff at reback.net>
>>> *Subject:* *Re: [pandas] Windows automated builds not updated recently?
>>> (#4053)*
>>> *Reply-To:* pydata/pandas <
>>> reply+i-16085374-ccb8a7fe7f13e69232c53d60467e6b4324c74832-953992 at reply.github.com
>>> >
>>>
>>> I'm also patiently waiting on this one too. :)
>>>
>>> ?
>>> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<https://github.com/pydata/pandas/issues/4053#issuecomment-20451007>
>>> .
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Pandas-dev mailing list
>>> Pandas-dev at python.org
>>> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pandas-dev
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pandas-dev mailing list
>> Pandas-dev at python.org
>> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pandas-dev
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/pandas-dev/attachments/20130703/dbec15f5/attachment-0001.html>

From cpcloud at gmail.com  Thu Jul  4 04:03:48 2013
From: cpcloud at gmail.com (Phillip Cloud)
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2013 22:03:48 -0400
Subject: [Pandas-dev] Fwd: [pandas] Windows automated builds not updated
 recently? (#4053)
In-Reply-To: <CADwh0WN04nZEbRB2bVLtkkAdT0QoVR6HBRYp0-01CRK7Gq34-g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <pydata/pandas/issues/4053/20451007@github.com>
	<483BDD0E-2E8C-4985-899E-4D88ABA5F206@yahoo.com>
	<CADwh0WN9Jf1D=uMYzMsFfJnRLTovpZvf4n=GkVNEosU1U1UJGA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJPUwMAh_ctVg83=7G8kfLKiRjL4Ef6kMLdzxiCH8GqppcR04Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<CADwh0WN04nZEbRB2bVLtkkAdT0QoVR6HBRYp0-01CRK7Gq34-g@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAKRVfm4r+TyQdR0u+ko2vEPATNzRYLaoHRXOeNbbors-cy3OzA@mail.gmail.com>

No test failures for 1.6, I'm assuming?


--
Best,
Phillip Cloud


On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 9:58 PM, Chang She <changshe at gmail.com> wrote:

> some test failures:
>
> https://github.com/pydata/pandas/issues/4122
>
> wrt NumPy 1.7.x, should we get another box so we can run both 1.6 and 1.7?
> Should we consider using windows azure or something?
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 5:10 PM, Wes McKinney <wesmckinn at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> We also need to upgrade the environments to NumPy 1.7.x
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 4:26 PM, Chang She <changshe at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I cleared up the hard drive and restarted the box last week.
>>> I will check again in a bit
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Jeff Reback <jreback at yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> any luck on the windows builds?
>>>>
>>>> hopefully can get some feedback from windows users on 0.12-dev
>>>>
>>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>>>
>>>> *From:* Gagi <notifications at github.com>
>>>> *Date:* July 3, 2013, 7:15:46 PM EDT
>>>> *To:* pydata/pandas <pandas at noreply.github.com>
>>>> *Cc:* jreback <jeff at reback.net>
>>>> *Subject:* *Re: [pandas] Windows automated builds not updated
>>>> recently? (#4053)*
>>>> *Reply-To:* pydata/pandas <
>>>> reply+i-16085374-ccb8a7fe7f13e69232c53d60467e6b4324c74832-953992 at reply.github.com
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>> I'm also patiently waiting on this one too. :)
>>>>
>>>> ?
>>>> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<https://github.com/pydata/pandas/issues/4053#issuecomment-20451007>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Pandas-dev mailing list
>>>> Pandas-dev at python.org
>>>> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pandas-dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Pandas-dev mailing list
>>> Pandas-dev at python.org
>>> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pandas-dev
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pandas-dev mailing list
> Pandas-dev at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pandas-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/pandas-dev/attachments/20130703/0cbb730c/attachment.html>

From wesmckinn at gmail.com  Thu Jul  4 04:06:37 2013
From: wesmckinn at gmail.com (Wes McKinney)
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2013 19:06:37 -0700
Subject: [Pandas-dev] Fwd: [pandas] Windows automated builds not updated
 recently? (#4053)
In-Reply-To: <CAKRVfm4r+TyQdR0u+ko2vEPATNzRYLaoHRXOeNbbors-cy3OzA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <pydata/pandas/issues/4053/20451007@github.com>
	<483BDD0E-2E8C-4985-899E-4D88ABA5F206@yahoo.com>
	<CADwh0WN9Jf1D=uMYzMsFfJnRLTovpZvf4n=GkVNEosU1U1UJGA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJPUwMAh_ctVg83=7G8kfLKiRjL4Ef6kMLdzxiCH8GqppcR04Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<CADwh0WN04nZEbRB2bVLtkkAdT0QoVR6HBRYp0-01CRK7Gq34-g@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAKRVfm4r+TyQdR0u+ko2vEPATNzRYLaoHRXOeNbbors-cy3OzA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAJPUwMCjakH5P_Jp8gxEj4=2GEq6RK+W7uCkU1fsskTvO2Zc-g@mail.gmail.com>

Can probably stop testing on NumPy 1.6 in Windows

On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 7:03 PM, Phillip Cloud <cpcloud at gmail.com> wrote:

> No test failures for 1.6, I'm assuming?
>
>
> --
> Best,
> Phillip Cloud
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 9:58 PM, Chang She <changshe at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> some test failures:
>>
>> https://github.com/pydata/pandas/issues/4122
>>
>> wrt NumPy 1.7.x, should we get another box so we can run both 1.6 and
>> 1.7? Should we consider using windows azure or something?
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 5:10 PM, Wes McKinney <wesmckinn at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> We also need to upgrade the environments to NumPy 1.7.x
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 4:26 PM, Chang She <changshe at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I cleared up the hard drive and restarted the box last week.
>>>> I will check again in a bit
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Jeff Reback <jreback at yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> any luck on the windows builds?
>>>>>
>>>>> hopefully can get some feedback from windows users on 0.12-dev
>>>>>
>>>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>>>>
>>>>> *From:* Gagi <notifications at github.com>
>>>>> *Date:* July 3, 2013, 7:15:46 PM EDT
>>>>> *To:* pydata/pandas <pandas at noreply.github.com>
>>>>> *Cc:* jreback <jeff at reback.net>
>>>>> *Subject:* *Re: [pandas] Windows automated builds not updated
>>>>> recently? (#4053)*
>>>>> *Reply-To:* pydata/pandas <
>>>>> reply+i-16085374-ccb8a7fe7f13e69232c53d60467e6b4324c74832-953992 at reply.github.com
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm also patiently waiting on this one too. :)
>>>>>
>>>>> ?
>>>>> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<https://github.com/pydata/pandas/issues/4053#issuecomment-20451007>
>>>>> .
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Pandas-dev mailing list
>>>>> Pandas-dev at python.org
>>>>> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pandas-dev
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Pandas-dev mailing list
>>>> Pandas-dev at python.org
>>>> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pandas-dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pandas-dev mailing list
>> Pandas-dev at python.org
>> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pandas-dev
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/pandas-dev/attachments/20130703/3a38758e/attachment.html>

From changshe at gmail.com  Thu Jul  4 04:07:28 2013
From: changshe at gmail.com (Chang She)
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2013 19:07:28 -0700
Subject: [Pandas-dev] Fwd: [pandas] Windows automated builds not updated
 recently? (#4053)
In-Reply-To: <CAKRVfm4r+TyQdR0u+ko2vEPATNzRYLaoHRXOeNbbors-cy3OzA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <pydata/pandas/issues/4053/20451007@github.com>
	<483BDD0E-2E8C-4985-899E-4D88ABA5F206@yahoo.com>
	<CADwh0WN9Jf1D=uMYzMsFfJnRLTovpZvf4n=GkVNEosU1U1UJGA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJPUwMAh_ctVg83=7G8kfLKiRjL4Ef6kMLdzxiCH8GqppcR04Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<CADwh0WN04nZEbRB2bVLtkkAdT0QoVR6HBRYp0-01CRK7Gq34-g@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAKRVfm4r+TyQdR0u+ko2vEPATNzRYLaoHRXOeNbbors-cy3OzA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CADwh0WNO25GyCZLooWXBDJ8vHgGD41Fd=F55yf7RbzrHv97J6A@mail.gmail.com>

i haven't upgraded to 1.7


On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 7:03 PM, Phillip Cloud <cpcloud at gmail.com> wrote:

> No test failures for 1.6, I'm assuming?
>
>
> --
> Best,
> Phillip Cloud
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 9:58 PM, Chang She <changshe at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> some test failures:
>>
>> https://github.com/pydata/pandas/issues/4122
>>
>> wrt NumPy 1.7.x, should we get another box so we can run both 1.6 and
>> 1.7? Should we consider using windows azure or something?
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 5:10 PM, Wes McKinney <wesmckinn at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> We also need to upgrade the environments to NumPy 1.7.x
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 4:26 PM, Chang She <changshe at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I cleared up the hard drive and restarted the box last week.
>>>> I will check again in a bit
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Jeff Reback <jreback at yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> any luck on the windows builds?
>>>>>
>>>>> hopefully can get some feedback from windows users on 0.12-dev
>>>>>
>>>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>>>>
>>>>> *From:* Gagi <notifications at github.com>
>>>>> *Date:* July 3, 2013, 7:15:46 PM EDT
>>>>> *To:* pydata/pandas <pandas at noreply.github.com>
>>>>> *Cc:* jreback <jeff at reback.net>
>>>>> *Subject:* *Re: [pandas] Windows automated builds not updated
>>>>> recently? (#4053)*
>>>>> *Reply-To:* pydata/pandas <
>>>>> reply+i-16085374-ccb8a7fe7f13e69232c53d60467e6b4324c74832-953992 at reply.github.com
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm also patiently waiting on this one too. :)
>>>>>
>>>>> ?
>>>>> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<https://github.com/pydata/pandas/issues/4053#issuecomment-20451007>
>>>>> .
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Pandas-dev mailing list
>>>>> Pandas-dev at python.org
>>>>> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pandas-dev
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Pandas-dev mailing list
>>>> Pandas-dev at python.org
>>>> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pandas-dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pandas-dev mailing list
>> Pandas-dev at python.org
>> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pandas-dev
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/pandas-dev/attachments/20130703/29006b91/attachment-0001.html>

From changshe at gmail.com  Thu Jul  4 05:26:41 2013
From: changshe at gmail.com (Chang She)
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2013 20:26:41 -0700
Subject: [Pandas-dev] Fwd: [pandas] Windows automated builds not updated
 recently? (#4053)
In-Reply-To: <CADwh0WNO25GyCZLooWXBDJ8vHgGD41Fd=F55yf7RbzrHv97J6A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <pydata/pandas/issues/4053/20451007@github.com>
	<483BDD0E-2E8C-4985-899E-4D88ABA5F206@yahoo.com>
	<CADwh0WN9Jf1D=uMYzMsFfJnRLTovpZvf4n=GkVNEosU1U1UJGA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJPUwMAh_ctVg83=7G8kfLKiRjL4Ef6kMLdzxiCH8GqppcR04Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<CADwh0WN04nZEbRB2bVLtkkAdT0QoVR6HBRYp0-01CRK7Gq34-g@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAKRVfm4r+TyQdR0u+ko2vEPATNzRYLaoHRXOeNbbors-cy3OzA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CADwh0WNO25GyCZLooWXBDJ8vHgGD41Fd=F55yf7RbzrHv97J6A@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CADwh0WMzXJxvOhi0kBePN4B5BCVj3oFP_dtFijtiRtmv-B3oRA@mail.gmail.com>

ok, all versions should be on 1.7.1 now.
Builds will be back up when the failing tests are resolved. Are they
windows specific?



On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 7:07 PM, Chang She <changshe at gmail.com> wrote:

> i haven't upgraded to 1.7
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 7:03 PM, Phillip Cloud <cpcloud at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> No test failures for 1.6, I'm assuming?
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best,
>> Phillip Cloud
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 9:58 PM, Chang She <changshe at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> some test failures:
>>>
>>> https://github.com/pydata/pandas/issues/4122
>>>
>>> wrt NumPy 1.7.x, should we get another box so we can run both 1.6 and
>>> 1.7? Should we consider using windows azure or something?
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 5:10 PM, Wes McKinney <wesmckinn at gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> We also need to upgrade the environments to NumPy 1.7.x
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 4:26 PM, Chang She <changshe at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I cleared up the hard drive and restarted the box last week.
>>>>> I will check again in a bit
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Jeff Reback <jreback at yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> any luck on the windows builds?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> hopefully can get some feedback from windows users on 0.12-dev
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *From:* Gagi <notifications at github.com>
>>>>>> *Date:* July 3, 2013, 7:15:46 PM EDT
>>>>>> *To:* pydata/pandas <pandas at noreply.github.com>
>>>>>> *Cc:* jreback <jeff at reback.net>
>>>>>> *Subject:* *Re: [pandas] Windows automated builds not updated
>>>>>> recently? (#4053)*
>>>>>> *Reply-To:* pydata/pandas <
>>>>>> reply+i-16085374-ccb8a7fe7f13e69232c53d60467e6b4324c74832-953992 at reply.github.com
>>>>>> >
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm also patiently waiting on this one too. :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ?
>>>>>> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<https://github.com/pydata/pandas/issues/4053#issuecomment-20451007>
>>>>>> .
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Pandas-dev mailing list
>>>>>> Pandas-dev at python.org
>>>>>> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pandas-dev
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Pandas-dev mailing list
>>>>> Pandas-dev at python.org
>>>>> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pandas-dev
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Pandas-dev mailing list
>>> Pandas-dev at python.org
>>> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pandas-dev
>>>
>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/pandas-dev/attachments/20130703/6c49d0de/attachment.html>

From cpcloud at gmail.com  Mon Jul  8 06:34:33 2013
From: cpcloud at gmail.com (Phillip Cloud)
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2013 00:34:33 -0400
Subject: [Pandas-dev] all 0.12 issues closed
Message-ID: <CAKRVfm6W=QgUG9gRHc_0yzGq=mCtxQLxAByzZX9TMibKGuW7-A@mail.gmail.com>

Anything else to do for 0.12?

--
Best,
Phillip Cloud
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/pandas-dev/attachments/20130708/7780b9e9/attachment.html>

From cpcloud at gmail.com  Mon Jul  8 06:38:36 2013
From: cpcloud at gmail.com (Phillip Cloud)
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2013 00:38:36 -0400
Subject: [Pandas-dev] all 0.12 issues closed
In-Reply-To: <CAKRVfm6W=QgUG9gRHc_0yzGq=mCtxQLxAByzZX9TMibKGuW7-A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAKRVfm6W=QgUG9gRHc_0yzGq=mCtxQLxAByzZX9TMibKGuW7-A@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAKRVfm6qyX=-2DZgjTsyKW92aBkbFf+++jjTu7O+ov0gRaJQPg@mail.gmail.com>

Also I wanted to say thanks to Jeff and Yoval for showing me the ropes of
pandas (still a ton to learn), much appreciated!


--
Best,
Phillip Cloud


On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 12:34 AM, Phillip Cloud <cpcloud at gmail.com> wrote:

> Anything else to do for 0.12?
>
> --
> Best,
> Phillip Cloud
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/pandas-dev/attachments/20130708/6b7fc9f8/attachment.html>

From jreback at yahoo.com  Mon Jul  8 13:49:23 2013
From: jreback at yahoo.com (Jeff Reback)
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2013 07:49:23 -0400
Subject: [Pandas-dev] Fwd: [pandas] read_clipboard() failed for sphinx in
	dev-99ae9ce (#4157)
References: <pydata/pandas/issues/4157@github.com>
Message-ID: <A8A13620-AF14-49E9-921B-C7B1D9409881@yahoo.com>

Chang

can u look at this on your doc build machine?

Begin forwarded message:

> From: "K.-Michael Aye" <notifications at github.com>
> Date: July 8, 2013, 4:02:04 AM EDT
> To: pydata/pandas <pandas at noreply.github.com>
> Subject: [pandas] read_clipboard() failed for sphinx in dev-99ae9ce (#4157)
> Reply-To: pydata/pandas <reply+i-16459191-763d9a8676c150aa0361595a5de26ae2f4d1654e-953992 at reply.github.com>
> 
> See here:
> http://pandas.pydata.org/pandas-docs/dev/io.html
> 
> and scroll to the clipboard section.
> Line [1215] with read_clipboard() failed.
> 
> ?
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/pandas-dev/attachments/20130708/e1ac46e1/attachment.html>

From wesmckinn at gmail.com  Mon Jul  8 20:56:15 2013
From: wesmckinn at gmail.com (Wes McKinney)
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2013 11:56:15 -0700
Subject: [Pandas-dev] all 0.12 issues closed
In-Reply-To: <CAKRVfm6qyX=-2DZgjTsyKW92aBkbFf+++jjTu7O+ov0gRaJQPg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAKRVfm6W=QgUG9gRHc_0yzGq=mCtxQLxAByzZX9TMibKGuW7-A@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAKRVfm6qyX=-2DZgjTsyKW92aBkbFf+++jjTu7O+ov0gRaJQPg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAJPUwMD4Te8r5RoL4PGwyVnA=YOB3i7KwaAELTQ5cSOgBQnDaw@mail.gmail.com>

Couldn't be happier to have you guys involved in the project.

I'll see about cutting an 0.12 RC today and getting it up for testing.
Cut 0.12 final in 1 weeks' time.

On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 9:38 PM, Phillip Cloud <cpcloud at gmail.com> wrote:
> Also I wanted to say thanks to Jeff and Yoval for showing me the ropes of
> pandas (still a ton to learn), much appreciated!
>
>
> --
> Best,
> Phillip Cloud
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 12:34 AM, Phillip Cloud <cpcloud at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Anything else to do for 0.12?
>>
>> --
>> Best,
>> Phillip Cloud
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pandas-dev mailing list
> Pandas-dev at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pandas-dev
>

From wesmckinn at gmail.com  Tue Jul  9 07:07:05 2013
From: wesmckinn at gmail.com (Wes McKinney)
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2013 22:07:05 -0700
Subject: [Pandas-dev] all 0.12 issues closed
In-Reply-To: <CAJPUwMD4Te8r5RoL4PGwyVnA=YOB3i7KwaAELTQ5cSOgBQnDaw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAKRVfm6W=QgUG9gRHc_0yzGq=mCtxQLxAByzZX9TMibKGuW7-A@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAKRVfm6qyX=-2DZgjTsyKW92aBkbFf+++jjTu7O+ov0gRaJQPg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJPUwMD4Te8r5RoL4PGwyVnA=YOB3i7KwaAELTQ5cSOgBQnDaw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAJPUwMA2M6UH8m=X=OibhD03omKSzndtBq-Jhq94SDzcchR+6g@mail.gmail.com>

Could you guys give me a 0.12 1 paragraph summary and top 5-7 bullet
points for the pandas website?

On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Wes McKinney <wesmckinn at gmail.com> wrote:
> Couldn't be happier to have you guys involved in the project.
>
> I'll see about cutting an 0.12 RC today and getting it up for testing.
> Cut 0.12 final in 1 weeks' time.
>
> On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 9:38 PM, Phillip Cloud <cpcloud at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Also I wanted to say thanks to Jeff and Yoval for showing me the ropes of
>> pandas (still a ton to learn), much appreciated!
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best,
>> Phillip Cloud
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 12:34 AM, Phillip Cloud <cpcloud at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Anything else to do for 0.12?
>>>
>>> --
>>> Best,
>>> Phillip Cloud
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pandas-dev mailing list
>> Pandas-dev at python.org
>> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pandas-dev
>>

From cpcloud at gmail.com  Tue Jul  9 08:43:55 2013
From: cpcloud at gmail.com (Phillip Cloud)
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2013 02:43:55 -0400
Subject: [Pandas-dev] all 0.12 issues closed
In-Reply-To: <CAJPUwMA2M6UH8m=X=OibhD03omKSzndtBq-Jhq94SDzcchR+6g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAKRVfm6W=QgUG9gRHc_0yzGq=mCtxQLxAByzZX9TMibKGuW7-A@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAKRVfm6qyX=-2DZgjTsyKW92aBkbFf+++jjTu7O+ov0gRaJQPg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJPUwMD4Te8r5RoL4PGwyVnA=YOB3i7KwaAELTQ5cSOgBQnDaw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJPUwMA2M6UH8m=X=OibhD03omKSzndtBq-Jhq94SDzcchR+6g@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAKRVfm6P31k3gt9qZnhN7ANdU=qLC8M1GA-VD2EW2_efGX88iw@mail.gmail.com>

A new release is available: 0.12. This is a major release from 0.11.
Pandas 0.12 introduces a host of new functionality, along with a nice
smattering of bug fixes. The I/O has seen the most improvement
including a unified data IO interface supporting the following formats

* reading/writing JSON
* reading/writing STATA
* reading HTML

Additionally, there is support for HDFStore objects in Python 3, a built-in
method for filtering groupby objects,
and hierarchical index objects can now be written to CSV files.


On Jul 9, 2013 1:07 AM, "Wes McKinney" <wesmckinn at gmail.com> wrote:

> Could you guys give me a 0.12 1 paragraph summary and top 5-7 bullet
> points for the pandas website?
>
> On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Wes McKinney <wesmckinn at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Couldn't be happier to have you guys involved in the project.
> >
> > I'll see about cutting an 0.12 RC today and getting it up for testing.
> > Cut 0.12 final in 1 weeks' time.
> >
> > On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 9:38 PM, Phillip Cloud <cpcloud at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Also I wanted to say thanks to Jeff and Yoval for showing me the ropes
> of
> >> pandas (still a ton to learn), much appreciated!
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Best,
> >> Phillip Cloud
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 12:34 AM, Phillip Cloud <cpcloud at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Anything else to do for 0.12?
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Best,
> >>> Phillip Cloud
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Pandas-dev mailing list
> >> Pandas-dev at python.org
> >> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pandas-dev
> >>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/pandas-dev/attachments/20130709/85eeda54/attachment.html>

From cpcloud at gmail.com  Tue Jul  9 08:46:58 2013
From: cpcloud at gmail.com (Phillip Cloud)
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2013 02:46:58 -0400
Subject: [Pandas-dev] all 0.12 issues closed
In-Reply-To: <CAKRVfm6P31k3gt9qZnhN7ANdU=qLC8M1GA-VD2EW2_efGX88iw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAKRVfm6W=QgUG9gRHc_0yzGq=mCtxQLxAByzZX9TMibKGuW7-A@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAKRVfm6qyX=-2DZgjTsyKW92aBkbFf+++jjTu7O+ov0gRaJQPg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJPUwMD4Te8r5RoL4PGwyVnA=YOB3i7KwaAELTQ5cSOgBQnDaw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJPUwMA2M6UH8m=X=OibhD03omKSzndtBq-Jhq94SDzcchR+6g@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAKRVfm6P31k3gt9qZnhN7ANdU=qLC8M1GA-VD2EW2_efGX88iw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAKRVfm508bJ34vaJUt-PVu9tjMvXdrU9=C-40RWbgjFjBmJfEw@mail.gmail.com>

Sorry that last email was an accident. Hit Ctrl-Enter :|

Here's what I have, somewhat piggybacking on what's already in the 0.12
what's new:

A new release is available: v0.12. This is a major release from 0.11.
Pandas 0.12 introduces a host of new functionality, along with a nice
smattering of bug fixes.
The I/O API has seen the most improvement and now supports (even) more
formats including

* reading/writing JSON
* reading/writing STATA
* reading HTML

Furthermore, the I/O has been unified so that all I/O functions following a
similar naming scheme. Additionally, there is support for HDFStore objects
in Python 3,
a built-in method for filtering groupby objects, and hierarchical index
objects can now be written to CSV files.


--
Best,
Phillip Cloud


On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 2:43 AM, Phillip Cloud <cpcloud at gmail.com> wrote:

> A new release is available: 0.12. This is a major release from 0.11.
> Pandas 0.12 introduces a host of new functionality, along with a nice
> smattering of bug fixes. The I/O has seen the most improvement
> including a unified data IO interface supporting the following formats
>
> * reading/writing JSON
> * reading/writing STATA
> * reading HTML
>
> Additionally, there is support for HDFStore objects in Python 3, a
> built-in method for filtering groupby objects,
> and hierarchical index objects can now be written to CSV files.
>
>
> On Jul 9, 2013 1:07 AM, "Wes McKinney" <wesmckinn at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Could you guys give me a 0.12 1 paragraph summary and top 5-7 bullet
>> points for the pandas website?
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Wes McKinney <wesmckinn at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Couldn't be happier to have you guys involved in the project.
>> >
>> > I'll see about cutting an 0.12 RC today and getting it up for testing.
>> > Cut 0.12 final in 1 weeks' time.
>> >
>> > On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 9:38 PM, Phillip Cloud <cpcloud at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >> Also I wanted to say thanks to Jeff and Yoval for showing me the ropes
>> of
>> >> pandas (still a ton to learn), much appreciated!
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Best,
>> >> Phillip Cloud
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 12:34 AM, Phillip Cloud <cpcloud at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Anything else to do for 0.12?
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>> Best,
>> >>> Phillip Cloud
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> Pandas-dev mailing list
>> >> Pandas-dev at python.org
>> >> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pandas-dev
>> >>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/pandas-dev/attachments/20130709/9bc0113e/attachment-0001.html>

From cpcloud at gmail.com  Tue Jul  9 08:49:31 2013
From: cpcloud at gmail.com (Phillip Cloud)
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2013 02:49:31 -0400
Subject: [Pandas-dev] all 0.12 issues closed
In-Reply-To: <CAKRVfm508bJ34vaJUt-PVu9tjMvXdrU9=C-40RWbgjFjBmJfEw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAKRVfm6W=QgUG9gRHc_0yzGq=mCtxQLxAByzZX9TMibKGuW7-A@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAKRVfm6qyX=-2DZgjTsyKW92aBkbFf+++jjTu7O+ov0gRaJQPg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJPUwMD4Te8r5RoL4PGwyVnA=YOB3i7KwaAELTQ5cSOgBQnDaw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJPUwMA2M6UH8m=X=OibhD03omKSzndtBq-Jhq94SDzcchR+6g@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAKRVfm6P31k3gt9qZnhN7ANdU=qLC8M1GA-VD2EW2_efGX88iw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAKRVfm508bJ34vaJUt-PVu9tjMvXdrU9=C-40RWbgjFjBmJfEw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAKRVfm6M0y1XyA9=b1kpbWsSbUHA0rLt8k01kViyfTPMiPGNsA@mail.gmail.com>

Smattering wasn't the correct word, probably "slew of bug fixes" is better.


--
Best,
Phillip Cloud


On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 2:46 AM, Phillip Cloud <cpcloud at gmail.com> wrote:

> Sorry that last email was an accident. Hit Ctrl-Enter :|
>
> Here's what I have, somewhat piggybacking on what's already in the 0.12
> what's new:
>
> A new release is available: v0.12. This is a major release from 0.11.
> Pandas 0.12 introduces a host of new functionality, along with a nice
> smattering of bug fixes.
> The I/O API has seen the most improvement and now supports (even) more
> formats including
>
> * reading/writing JSON
>  * reading/writing STATA
> * reading HTML
>
> Furthermore, the I/O has been unified so that all I/O functions following
> a similar naming scheme. Additionally, there is support for HDFStore
> objects in Python 3,
>  a built-in method for filtering groupby objects, and hierarchical index
> objects can now be written to CSV files.
>
>
> --
> Best,
> Phillip Cloud
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 2:43 AM, Phillip Cloud <cpcloud at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> A new release is available: 0.12. This is a major release from 0.11.
>> Pandas 0.12 introduces a host of new functionality, along with a nice
>> smattering of bug fixes. The I/O has seen the most improvement
>> including a unified data IO interface supporting the following formats
>>
>> * reading/writing JSON
>> * reading/writing STATA
>> * reading HTML
>>
>> Additionally, there is support for HDFStore objects in Python 3, a
>> built-in method for filtering groupby objects,
>> and hierarchical index objects can now be written to CSV files.
>>
>>
>> On Jul 9, 2013 1:07 AM, "Wes McKinney" <wesmckinn at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Could you guys give me a 0.12 1 paragraph summary and top 5-7 bullet
>>> points for the pandas website?
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Wes McKinney <wesmckinn at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > Couldn't be happier to have you guys involved in the project.
>>> >
>>> > I'll see about cutting an 0.12 RC today and getting it up for testing.
>>> > Cut 0.12 final in 1 weeks' time.
>>> >
>>> > On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 9:38 PM, Phillip Cloud <cpcloud at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >> Also I wanted to say thanks to Jeff and Yoval for showing me the
>>> ropes of
>>> >> pandas (still a ton to learn), much appreciated!
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> --
>>> >> Best,
>>> >> Phillip Cloud
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 12:34 AM, Phillip Cloud <cpcloud at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Anything else to do for 0.12?
>>> >>>
>>> >>> --
>>> >>> Best,
>>> >>> Phillip Cloud
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>> >> Pandas-dev mailing list
>>> >> Pandas-dev at python.org
>>> >> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pandas-dev
>>> >>
>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/pandas-dev/attachments/20130709/c99f3e27/attachment.html>

From jeffreback at gmail.com  Tue Jul  9 15:12:08 2013
From: jeffreback at gmail.com (Jeff Reback)
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2013 09:12:08 -0400
Subject: [Pandas-dev] all 0.12 issues closed
In-Reply-To: <CAKRVfm6M0y1XyA9=b1kpbWsSbUHA0rLt8k01kViyfTPMiPGNsA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAKRVfm6W=QgUG9gRHc_0yzGq=mCtxQLxAByzZX9TMibKGuW7-A@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAKRVfm6qyX=-2DZgjTsyKW92aBkbFf+++jjTu7O+ov0gRaJQPg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJPUwMD4Te8r5RoL4PGwyVnA=YOB3i7KwaAELTQ5cSOgBQnDaw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJPUwMA2M6UH8m=X=OibhD03omKSzndtBq-Jhq94SDzcchR+6g@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAKRVfm6P31k3gt9qZnhN7ANdU=qLC8M1GA-VD2EW2_efGX88iw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAKRVfm508bJ34vaJUt-PVu9tjMvXdrU9=C-40RWbgjFjBmJfEw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAKRVfm6M0y1XyA9=b1kpbWsSbUHA0rLt8k01kViyfTPMiPGNsA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAHMnJKgGtBspuPM4V4wT+hpZ+Qi8ThNBmp865tpBHJTiBjj=dQ@mail.gmail.com>

Also a revamped ``replace`` routine that accepts regular expressions.
I would say Reading/Writing HTML




On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 2:49 AM, Phillip Cloud <cpcloud at gmail.com> wrote:

> Smattering wasn't the correct word, probably "slew of bug fixes" is better.
>
>
> --
> Best,
> Phillip Cloud
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 2:46 AM, Phillip Cloud <cpcloud at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Sorry that last email was an accident. Hit Ctrl-Enter :|
>>
>> Here's what I have, somewhat piggybacking on what's already in the 0.12
>> what's new:
>>
>> A new release is available: v0.12. This is a major release from 0.11.
>> Pandas 0.12 introduces a host of new functionality, along with a nice
>> smattering of bug fixes.
>> The I/O API has seen the most improvement and now supports (even) more
>> formats including
>>
>> * reading/writing JSON
>>  * reading/writing STATA
>> * reading HTML
>>
>> Furthermore, the I/O has been unified so that all I/O functions following
>> a similar naming scheme. Additionally, there is support for HDFStore
>> objects in Python 3,
>>  a built-in method for filtering groupby objects, and hierarchical index
>> objects can now be written to CSV files.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best,
>> Phillip Cloud
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 2:43 AM, Phillip Cloud <cpcloud at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> A new release is available: 0.12. This is a major release from 0.11.
>>> Pandas 0.12 introduces a host of new functionality, along with a nice
>>> smattering of bug fixes. The I/O has seen the most improvement
>>> including a unified data IO interface supporting the following formats
>>>
>>> * reading/writing JSON
>>> * reading/writing STATA
>>> * reading HTML
>>>
>>> Additionally, there is support for HDFStore objects in Python 3, a
>>> built-in method for filtering groupby objects,
>>> and hierarchical index objects can now be written to CSV files.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Jul 9, 2013 1:07 AM, "Wes McKinney" <wesmckinn at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Could you guys give me a 0.12 1 paragraph summary and top 5-7 bullet
>>>> points for the pandas website?
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Wes McKinney <wesmckinn at gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> > Couldn't be happier to have you guys involved in the project.
>>>> >
>>>> > I'll see about cutting an 0.12 RC today and getting it up for testing.
>>>> > Cut 0.12 final in 1 weeks' time.
>>>> >
>>>> > On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 9:38 PM, Phillip Cloud <cpcloud at gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> >> Also I wanted to say thanks to Jeff and Yoval for showing me the
>>>> ropes of
>>>> >> pandas (still a ton to learn), much appreciated!
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> --
>>>> >> Best,
>>>> >> Phillip Cloud
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 12:34 AM, Phillip Cloud <cpcloud at gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Anything else to do for 0.12?
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> --
>>>> >>> Best,
>>>> >>> Phillip Cloud
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>>> >> Pandas-dev mailing list
>>>> >> Pandas-dev at python.org
>>>> >> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pandas-dev
>>>> >>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pandas-dev mailing list
> Pandas-dev at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pandas-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/pandas-dev/attachments/20130709/e8f7dc18/attachment.html>

From jreback at yahoo.com  Thu Jul 11 17:39:39 2013
From: jreback at yahoo.com (Jeff Reback)
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 11:39:39 -0400
Subject: [Pandas-dev] docs
Message-ID: <53E30354-BA7D-4BA2-8F71-6636B0FA9004@yahoo.com>

can we build with numpy  >= 1.7 
and there an issue with read_clipboard

thanks

Jeff 

From wesmckinn at gmail.com  Thu Jul 11 21:16:23 2013
From: wesmckinn at gmail.com (Wes McKinney)
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 12:16:23 -0700
Subject: [Pandas-dev] docs
In-Reply-To: <53E30354-BA7D-4BA2-8F71-6636B0FA9004@yahoo.com>
References: <53E30354-BA7D-4BA2-8F71-6636B0FA9004@yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <CAJPUwMDDh94CbDr10S3fSjHW6i7Ub4s9eBjOpduFw2D9iVKDeA@mail.gmail.com>

Sure let me upgrade the box

On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 8:39 AM, Jeff Reback <jreback at yahoo.com> wrote:
> can we build with numpy  >= 1.7
> and there an issue with read_clipboard
>
> thanks
>
> Jeff
> _______________________________________________
> Pandas-dev mailing list
> Pandas-dev at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pandas-dev

From wesmckinn at gmail.com  Mon Jul 15 21:44:11 2013
From: wesmckinn at gmail.com (Wes McKinney)
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 12:44:11 -0700
Subject: [Pandas-dev] Remaining 0.12 items
Message-ID: <CAJPUwMCgD-cR7GqKKqkEy0yO036==pUgvKehvmFrbhkhj2Aopw@mail.gmail.com>

Where do we stand on shipping 0.12? Looks like a couple test failures
remaining. I can have a look a bit later today if no one gets to them
first.

We still need to update the docs build box for NumPy 1.7, will do so soon

- Wes

From cpcloud at gmail.com  Mon Jul 15 21:49:49 2013
From: cpcloud at gmail.com (Phillip Cloud)
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 15:49:49 -0400
Subject: [Pandas-dev] Remaining 0.12 items
In-Reply-To: <CAJPUwMCgD-cR7GqKKqkEy0yO036==pUgvKehvmFrbhkhj2Aopw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAJPUwMCgD-cR7GqKKqkEy0yO036==pUgvKehvmFrbhkhj2Aopw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAKRVfm4ehbjGxiEHQnaXeE43JcQH+1p=gF+wbN_NrnNL5CCQkA@mail.gmail.com>

I'll get to the test_google failure today (#4223)

waiting on @yarikoptic to run those tests, but they should be fixed (#4213,
#4212)
was an issue with his bs4 version and i don't think he was actually testing
master
for some of them

i'm not sure what's going on with read_clipboard. looks like it could be
platform issue.
what kind of machine are docs being built on?

After that, should be good to go.

--
Best,
Phillip Cloud


On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 3:44 PM, Wes McKinney <wesmckinn at gmail.com> wrote:

> Where do we stand on shipping 0.12? Looks like a couple test failures
> remaining. I can have a look a bit later today if no one gets to them
> first.
>
> We still need to update the docs build box for NumPy 1.7, will do so soon
>
> - Wes
> _______________________________________________
> Pandas-dev mailing list
> Pandas-dev at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pandas-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/pandas-dev/attachments/20130715/b2203864/attachment.html>

From jreback at yahoo.com  Tue Jul 16 15:44:34 2013
From: jreback at yahoo.com (Jeff Reback)
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 09:44:34 -0400
Subject: [Pandas-dev] v0.13.0
Message-ID: <B07EB166-6F1A-47F6-A391-DAFEBF35F7DE@yahoo.com>

added the 0.13 release notes file (but not in the index yet so docs will still build with 0.12)


From yoval at gmx.com  Tue Jul 16 20:05:20 2013
From: yoval at gmx.com (yoval p.)
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 21:05:20 +0300
Subject: [Pandas-dev] Pandas v0.12.1 bugfix release
Message-ID: <51E58B60.8030100@gmx.com>

Hi guys,

As you might remember, there was some confusion post 0.11 on whether
the next release would be 0.12 or 0.11.1, with the result that a
speculative 0.12 became 0.11.1 eliding some borderline changes merged (I
certainly pushed some) which was delayed for so long that it has now
become 0.12 again under it's own weight.

Seems likely things can work better then that. Might I suggest now
would be a good time to block out a period post 0.12 to address
regressions and bug fixes before moving on to the next evolution?
2-4 weeks perhaps?

What do you think?

yoval


From cpcloud at gmail.com  Tue Jul 16 20:08:08 2013
From: cpcloud at gmail.com (Phillip Cloud)
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 14:08:08 -0400
Subject: [Pandas-dev] Pandas v0.12.1 bugfix release
In-Reply-To: <51E58B60.8030100@gmx.com>
References: <51E58B60.8030100@gmx.com>
Message-ID: <CAKRVfm6qyCjP02gJUedXEQqs3QaP7+0xoN0Wv1tPJLoKXzHphA@mail.gmail.com>

I agree with that. Maybe hold off on some of these PRs that are chomping at
the bit and make sure things are working relatively swimmingly before
opening the gates.


--
Best,
Phillip Cloud


On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 2:05 PM, yoval p. <yoval at gmx.com> wrote:

> Hi guys,
>
> As you might remember, there was some confusion post 0.11 on whether
> the next release would be 0.12 or 0.11.1, with the result that a
> speculative 0.12 became 0.11.1 eliding some borderline changes merged (I
> certainly pushed some) which was delayed for so long that it has now
> become 0.12 again under it's own weight.
>
> Seems likely things can work better then that. Might I suggest now
> would be a good time to block out a period post 0.12 to address
> regressions and bug fixes before moving on to the next evolution?
> 2-4 weeks perhaps?
>
> What do you think?
>
> yoval
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pandas-dev mailing list
> Pandas-dev at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pandas-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/pandas-dev/attachments/20130716/4387d2c1/attachment.html>

From wesmckinn at gmail.com  Thu Jul 18 06:43:57 2013
From: wesmckinn at gmail.com (Wes McKinney)
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 21:43:57 -0700
Subject: [Pandas-dev] Pandas v0.12.1 bugfix release
In-Reply-To: <CAKRVfm6qyCjP02gJUedXEQqs3QaP7+0xoN0Wv1tPJLoKXzHphA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <51E58B60.8030100@gmx.com>
	<CAKRVfm6qyCjP02gJUedXEQqs3QaP7+0xoN0Wv1tPJLoKXzHphA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAJPUwMBReROK25mKaPf2jXf9ytGUyvUUh2_xg9w49vp+kq4AOA@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 11:08 AM, Phillip Cloud <cpcloud at gmail.com> wrote:
> I agree with that. Maybe hold off on some of these PRs that are chomping at
> the bit and make sure things are working relatively swimmingly before
> opening the gates.
>
>
> --
> Best,
> Phillip Cloud
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 2:05 PM, yoval p. <yoval at gmx.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> As you might remember, there was some confusion post 0.11 on whether
>> the next release would be 0.12 or 0.11.1, with the result that a
>> speculative 0.12 became 0.11.1 eliding some borderline changes merged (I
>> certainly pushed some) which was delayed for so long that it has now
>> become 0.12 again under it's own weight.
>>
>> Seems likely things can work better then that. Might I suggest now
>> would be a good time to block out a period post 0.12 to address
>> regressions and bug fixes before moving on to the next evolution?
>> 2-4 weeks perhaps?
>>
>> What do you think?
>>
>> yoval
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pandas-dev mailing list
>> Pandas-dev at python.org
>> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pandas-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pandas-dev mailing list
> Pandas-dev at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pandas-dev
>

I'll try to get the 0.12 out the door tomorrow afternoon if ya'll give
me the all clear. Should probably set up a 0.12.x maintenance branch
where critical bug fixes can be backported for a 0.12.1 if necessary.
it'd be nice to keep 0.12.x nice and stable for a while.

From wesmckinn at gmail.com  Fri Jul 19 01:50:55 2013
From: wesmckinn at gmail.com (Wes McKinney)
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 16:50:55 -0700
Subject: [Pandas-dev] Pandas v0.12.1 bugfix release
In-Reply-To: <C0921F3B-C489-4C36-B4CA-FE0034BB82E9@gmail.com>
References: <51E58B60.8030100@gmx.com>
	<CAKRVfm6qyCjP02gJUedXEQqs3QaP7+0xoN0Wv1tPJLoKXzHphA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJPUwMBReROK25mKaPf2jXf9ytGUyvUUh2_xg9w49vp+kq4AOA@mail.gmail.com>
	<C0921F3B-C489-4C36-B4CA-FE0034BB82E9@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAJPUwMAdBKdZ5=eU8R--TPdrt1AsuECj-=TZ3e7GWNkNvbAJ4A@mail.gmail.com>

i'll wait for confirmation and plan to cut the release tomorrow

On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 2:17 PM, Jeff Reback <jeffreback at gmail.com> wrote:
> I believe the debian guys has 1 retest on a ujson test, which was merged this morning...
>
> otherwise I think good to go
>
> On Jul 18, 2013, at 12:43 AM, Wes McKinney <wesmckinn at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 11:08 AM, Phillip Cloud <cpcloud at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I agree with that. Maybe hold off on some of these PRs that are chomping at
>>> the bit and make sure things are working relatively swimmingly before
>>> opening the gates.
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Best,
>>> Phillip Cloud
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 2:05 PM, yoval p. <yoval at gmx.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi guys,
>>>>
>>>> As you might remember, there was some confusion post 0.11 on whether
>>>> the next release would be 0.12 or 0.11.1, with the result that a
>>>> speculative 0.12 became 0.11.1 eliding some borderline changes merged (I
>>>> certainly pushed some) which was delayed for so long that it has now
>>>> become 0.12 again under it's own weight.
>>>>
>>>> Seems likely things can work better then that. Might I suggest now
>>>> would be a good time to block out a period post 0.12 to address
>>>> regressions and bug fixes before moving on to the next evolution?
>>>> 2-4 weeks perhaps?
>>>>
>>>> What do you think?
>>>>
>>>> yoval
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Pandas-dev mailing list
>>>> Pandas-dev at python.org
>>>> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pandas-dev
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Pandas-dev mailing list
>>> Pandas-dev at python.org
>>> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pandas-dev
>>
>> I'll try to get the 0.12 out the door tomorrow afternoon if ya'll give
>> me the all clear. Should probably set up a 0.12.x maintenance branch
>> where critical bug fixes can be backported for a 0.12.1 if necessary.
>> it'd be nice to keep 0.12.x nice and stable for a while.
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pandas-dev mailing list
>> Pandas-dev at python.org
>> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pandas-dev

From cpcloud at gmail.com  Fri Jul 19 02:47:45 2013
From: cpcloud at gmail.com (Phillip Cloud)
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 20:47:45 -0400
Subject: [Pandas-dev] Pandas v0.12.1 bugfix release
In-Reply-To: <CAJPUwMAdBKdZ5=eU8R--TPdrt1AsuECj-=TZ3e7GWNkNvbAJ4A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <51E58B60.8030100@gmx.com>
	<CAKRVfm6qyCjP02gJUedXEQqs3QaP7+0xoN0Wv1tPJLoKXzHphA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJPUwMBReROK25mKaPf2jXf9ytGUyvUUh2_xg9w49vp+kq4AOA@mail.gmail.com>
	<C0921F3B-C489-4C36-B4CA-FE0034BB82E9@gmail.com>
	<CAJPUwMAdBKdZ5=eU8R--TPdrt1AsuECj-=TZ3e7GWNkNvbAJ4A@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAKRVfm7RDP=NBFe1Qmb6DD049zYqqiaJc9BPVjMVMKXvZmnNuw@mail.gmail.com>

Hi guys,
The doc build issue #4157 is occurring I think because the docs are being
built on a headless server. Travis runs headless and their solution is to
"export DISPLAY=:99.0" and then start up Xvfb (X virtual frame buffer) to
mimic an X server. It works. I think this would solve the issue.

Travis starts up Xvfb like so:

sh -e /etc/init.d/xvfb start


--
Best,
Phillip Cloud


On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 7:50 PM, Wes McKinney <wesmckinn at gmail.com> wrote:

> i'll wait for confirmation and plan to cut the release tomorrow
>
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 2:17 PM, Jeff Reback <jeffreback at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I believe the debian guys has 1 retest on a ujson test, which was merged
> this morning...
> >
> > otherwise I think good to go
> >
> > On Jul 18, 2013, at 12:43 AM, Wes McKinney <wesmckinn at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 11:08 AM, Phillip Cloud <cpcloud at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>> I agree with that. Maybe hold off on some of these PRs that are
> chomping at
> >>> the bit and make sure things are working relatively swimmingly before
> >>> opening the gates.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Best,
> >>> Phillip Cloud
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 2:05 PM, yoval p. <yoval at gmx.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi guys,
> >>>>
> >>>> As you might remember, there was some confusion post 0.11 on whether
> >>>> the next release would be 0.12 or 0.11.1, with the result that a
> >>>> speculative 0.12 became 0.11.1 eliding some borderline changes merged
> (I
> >>>> certainly pushed some) which was delayed for so long that it has now
> >>>> become 0.12 again under it's own weight.
> >>>>
> >>>> Seems likely things can work better then that. Might I suggest now
> >>>> would be a good time to block out a period post 0.12 to address
> >>>> regressions and bug fixes before moving on to the next evolution?
> >>>> 2-4 weeks perhaps?
> >>>>
> >>>> What do you think?
> >>>>
> >>>> yoval
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> Pandas-dev mailing list
> >>>> Pandas-dev at python.org
> >>>> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pandas-dev
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Pandas-dev mailing list
> >>> Pandas-dev at python.org
> >>> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pandas-dev
> >>
> >> I'll try to get the 0.12 out the door tomorrow afternoon if ya'll give
> >> me the all clear. Should probably set up a 0.12.x maintenance branch
> >> where critical bug fixes can be backported for a 0.12.1 if necessary.
> >> it'd be nice to keep 0.12.x nice and stable for a while.
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Pandas-dev mailing list
> >> Pandas-dev at python.org
> >> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pandas-dev
> _______________________________________________
> Pandas-dev mailing list
> Pandas-dev at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pandas-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/pandas-dev/attachments/20130718/d2c70dbf/attachment.html>

From cpcloud at gmail.com  Fri Jul 19 17:42:45 2013
From: cpcloud at gmail.com (Phillip Cloud)
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 11:42:45 -0400
Subject: [Pandas-dev] Docs
Message-ID: <CAKRVfm6PkpEsdbJaqxVSnEkfmC2KE+LJynezV_KRpfh1FyLVbw@mail.gmail.com>

Hi all,
I'm wondering if moving the docs over to http://www.rtfd.org might be
useful in the long run. It would certainly lift the load on Wes and Chang
since they wouldn't have to maintain a separate machine to build docs. Doc
builds happen automatically when a push is made (I think you can customize
this) and they only show up if the build passes. You can also set up a
couple of branches/tags to build from so that users automatically have the
option to see stable vs dev docs.

--
Best,
Phillip Cloud
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/pandas-dev/attachments/20130719/5305b909/attachment.html>

From jeffreback at gmail.com  Fri Jul 19 21:03:43 2013
From: jeffreback at gmail.com (Jeff Reback)
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 15:03:43 -0400
Subject: [Pandas-dev] Docs
In-Reply-To: <CAKRVfm6PkpEsdbJaqxVSnEkfmC2KE+LJynezV_KRpfh1FyLVbw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAKRVfm6PkpEsdbJaqxVSnEkfmC2KE+LJynezV_KRpfh1FyLVbw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <78F83822-1327-4BBF-809A-77E323F12C7D@gmail.com>

I would be +1 on this


On Jul 19, 2013, at 11:42 AM, Phillip Cloud <cpcloud at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
> I'm wondering if moving the docs over to http://www.rtfd.org might be useful in the long run. It would certainly lift the load on Wes and Chang since they wouldn't have to maintain a separate machine to build docs. Doc builds happen automatically when a push is made (I think you can customize this) and they only show up if the build passes. You can also set up a couple of branches/tags to build from so that users automatically have the option to see stable vs dev docs.
> 
> --
> Best,
> Phillip Cloud
> _______________________________________________
> Pandas-dev mailing list
> Pandas-dev at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pandas-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/pandas-dev/attachments/20130719/8132fed7/attachment.html>

From jreback at yahoo.com  Sat Jul 20 03:53:03 2013
From: jreback at yahoo.com (Jeff Reback)
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 21:53:03 -0400
Subject: [Pandas-dev] 0.12
Message-ID: <946567E8-0093-46D4-9487-CDC25E634A03@yahoo.com>

all remaining issues with ujson and reported Debian failures on big endian now closed

pending whatever Yaroslavl wants to retest I think good to go for release


Jeff


From cpcloud at gmail.com  Sat Jul 20 21:42:14 2013
From: cpcloud at gmail.com (Phillip Cloud)
Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2013 15:42:14 -0400
Subject: [Pandas-dev] Docs
In-Reply-To: <78F83822-1327-4BBF-809A-77E323F12C7D@gmail.com>
References: <CAKRVfm6PkpEsdbJaqxVSnEkfmC2KE+LJynezV_KRpfh1FyLVbw@mail.gmail.com>
	<78F83822-1327-4BBF-809A-77E323F12C7D@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAKRVfm6iVJfM5Y-SZbnyrJa2ZtmrOR_-aucTj0CjqSBsp2s4bA@mail.gmail.com>

This will have to wait for now, since rtfd doesn't support any C libraries
needed by pandas to build its documentation, so e.g., none of the IPython
snippets will evalutate nor will any plots be created.


--
Best,
Phillip Cloud


On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 3:03 PM, Jeff Reback <jeffreback at gmail.com> wrote:

> I would be +1 on this
>
>
> On Jul 19, 2013, at 11:42 AM, Phillip Cloud <cpcloud at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> I'm wondering if moving the docs over to http://www.rtfd.org might be
> useful in the long run. It would certainly lift the load on Wes and Chang
> since they wouldn't have to maintain a separate machine to build docs. Doc
> builds happen automatically when a push is made (I think you can customize
> this) and they only show up if the build passes. You can also set up a
> couple of branches/tags to build from so that users automatically have the
> option to see stable vs dev docs.
>
> --
> Best,
> Phillip Cloud
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pandas-dev mailing list
> Pandas-dev at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pandas-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/pandas-dev/attachments/20130720/85d3edb7/attachment.html>

From lists at onerussian.com  Sat Jul 20 15:42:14 2013
From: lists at onerussian.com (Yaroslav Halchenko)
Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2013 09:42:14 -0400
Subject: [Pandas-dev] 0.12
In-Reply-To: <946567E8-0093-46D4-9487-CDC25E634A03@yahoo.com>
References: <946567E8-0093-46D4-9487-CDC25E634A03@yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <20130720134214.GM17125@onerussian.com>


On Fri, 19 Jul 2013, Jeff Reback wrote:

> all remaining issues with ujson and reported Debian failures on big endian now closed

> pending whatever Yaroslavl wants to retest I think good to go for release

if there is time I would like to reupload current master to debian
proper and see how it builds across... that is not mandatory to wait
though -- I could always apply patches later on, but it might be nice to
kick out a 'totally clean' release.

building it now

Cheers
-- 
Yaroslav O. Halchenko, Ph.D.
http://neuro.debian.net http://www.pymvpa.org http://www.fail2ban.org
Senior Research Associate,     Psychological and Brain Sciences Dept.
Dartmouth College, 419 Moore Hall, Hinman Box 6207, Hanover, NH 03755
Phone: +1 (603) 646-9834                       Fax: +1 (603) 646-1419
WWW:   http://www.linkedin.com/in/yarik        

From jeffreback at gmail.com  Mon Jul 22 20:43:40 2013
From: jeffreback at gmail.com (Jeff Reback)
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 14:43:40 -0400
Subject: [Pandas-dev] 0.12
In-Reply-To: <20130720134214.GM17125@onerussian.com>
References: <946567E8-0093-46D4-9487-CDC25E634A03@yahoo.com>
	<20130720134214.GM17125@onerussian.com>
Message-ID: <4AA0EC63-5B0C-40EB-8089-5DA24F64F0AE@gmail.com>

good to go?

On Jul 20, 2013, at 9:42 AM, Yaroslav Halchenko <lists at onerussian.com> wrote:

> 
> On Fri, 19 Jul 2013, Jeff Reback wrote:
> 
>> all remaining issues with ujson and reported Debian failures on big endian now closed
> 
>> pending whatever Yaroslavl wants to retest I think good to go for release
> 
> if there is time I would like to reupload current master to debian
> proper and see how it builds across... that is not mandatory to wait
> though -- I could always apply patches later on, but it might be nice to
> kick out a 'totally clean' release.
> 
> building it now
> 
> Cheers
> -- 
> Yaroslav O. Halchenko, Ph.D.
> http://neuro.debian.net http://www.pymvpa.org http://www.fail2ban.org
> Senior Research Associate,     Psychological and Brain Sciences Dept.
> Dartmouth College, 419 Moore Hall, Hinman Box 6207, Hanover, NH 03755
> Phone: +1 (603) 646-9834                       Fax: +1 (603) 646-1419
> WWW:   http://www.linkedin.com/in/yarik        
> _______________________________________________
> Pandas-dev mailing list
> Pandas-dev at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pandas-dev

From wesmckinn at gmail.com  Mon Jul 22 20:45:44 2013
From: wesmckinn at gmail.com (Wes McKinney)
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 11:45:44 -0700
Subject: [Pandas-dev] 0.12
In-Reply-To: <4AA0EC63-5B0C-40EB-8089-5DA24F64F0AE@gmail.com>
References: <946567E8-0093-46D4-9487-CDC25E634A03@yahoo.com>
	<20130720134214.GM17125@onerussian.com>
	<4AA0EC63-5B0C-40EB-8089-5DA24F64F0AE@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAJPUwMBvVo+7Fi3YsnLaNj1ta9LJtkfpHb2xytCYP-n3CsgMsA@mail.gmail.com>

I can cut the release this afternoon (pacific) if all looks good.

On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Jeff Reback <jeffreback at gmail.com> wrote:
> good to go?
>
> On Jul 20, 2013, at 9:42 AM, Yaroslav Halchenko <lists at onerussian.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Fri, 19 Jul 2013, Jeff Reback wrote:
>>
>>> all remaining issues with ujson and reported Debian failures on big endian now closed
>>
>>> pending whatever Yaroslavl wants to retest I think good to go for release
>>
>> if there is time I would like to reupload current master to debian
>> proper and see how it builds across... that is not mandatory to wait
>> though -- I could always apply patches later on, but it might be nice to
>> kick out a 'totally clean' release.
>>
>> building it now
>>
>> Cheers
>> --
>> Yaroslav O. Halchenko, Ph.D.
>> http://neuro.debian.net http://www.pymvpa.org http://www.fail2ban.org
>> Senior Research Associate,     Psychological and Brain Sciences Dept.
>> Dartmouth College, 419 Moore Hall, Hinman Box 6207, Hanover, NH 03755
>> Phone: +1 (603) 646-9834                       Fax: +1 (603) 646-1419
>> WWW:   http://www.linkedin.com/in/yarik
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pandas-dev mailing list
>> Pandas-dev at python.org
>> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pandas-dev
> _______________________________________________
> Pandas-dev mailing list
> Pandas-dev at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pandas-dev

From lists at onerussian.com  Mon Jul 22 20:54:43 2013
From: lists at onerussian.com (Yaroslav Halchenko)
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 14:54:43 -0400
Subject: [Pandas-dev] 0.12
In-Reply-To: <CAJPUwMBvVo+7Fi3YsnLaNj1ta9LJtkfpHb2xytCYP-n3CsgMsA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <946567E8-0093-46D4-9487-CDC25E634A03@yahoo.com>
	<20130720134214.GM17125@onerussian.com>
	<4AA0EC63-5B0C-40EB-8089-5DA24F64F0AE@gmail.com>
	<CAJPUwMBvVo+7Fi3YsnLaNj1ta9LJtkfpHb2xytCYP-n3CsgMsA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20130722185443.GU17125@onerussian.com>

if that 32bit comparison issue is resolved -- should be good to go on my
side

https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=pandas&suite=experimental

NB some builds failed, I guess due to high memory demand on some exotic
architectures -- nothing for you to worry about

btw - would be neat if no stdout is produced while running tests,
now there is a bulk of

25   -0.815902
26   -0.782240
27   -0.536019
28         NaN
29         NaN
dtype: float64
0          NaN
...
False
                    b
0 2001-01-01 00:00:00
1 2001-01-02 00:00:00
                    b
0 2001-01-01 00:00:00
1 2001-01-02 00:00:00
...

which complicate a bit quick look at the failures

-- 
Yaroslav O. Halchenko, Ph.D.
http://neuro.debian.net http://www.pymvpa.org http://www.fail2ban.org
Senior Research Associate,     Psychological and Brain Sciences Dept.
Dartmouth College, 419 Moore Hall, Hinman Box 6207, Hanover, NH 03755
Phone: +1 (603) 646-9834                       Fax: +1 (603) 646-1419
WWW:   http://www.linkedin.com/in/yarik        

From lists at onerussian.com  Mon Jul 22 20:56:17 2013
From: lists at onerussian.com (Yaroslav Halchenko)
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 14:56:17 -0400
Subject: [Pandas-dev] 0.12
In-Reply-To: <CAJPUwMBvVo+7Fi3YsnLaNj1ta9LJtkfpHb2xytCYP-n3CsgMsA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <946567E8-0093-46D4-9487-CDC25E634A03@yahoo.com>
	<20130720134214.GM17125@onerussian.com>
	<4AA0EC63-5B0C-40EB-8089-5DA24F64F0AE@gmail.com>
	<CAJPUwMBvVo+7Fi3YsnLaNj1ta9LJtkfpHb2xytCYP-n3CsgMsA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20130722185617.GV17125@onerussian.com>

btw -- sparc box now sweats a bit ;)

http://nipy.bic.berkeley.edu/builders/pandas-py2.x-sid-sparc/builds/0
http://nipy.bic.berkeley.edu/builders/pandas-py3.x-sid-sparc/builds/0


On Mon, 22 Jul 2013, Wes McKinney wrote:

> I can cut the release this afternoon (pacific) if all looks good.

-- 
Yaroslav O. Halchenko, Ph.D.
http://neuro.debian.net http://www.pymvpa.org http://www.fail2ban.org
Senior Research Associate,     Psychological and Brain Sciences Dept.
Dartmouth College, 419 Moore Hall, Hinman Box 6207, Hanover, NH 03755
Phone: +1 (603) 646-9834                       Fax: +1 (603) 646-1419
WWW:   http://www.linkedin.com/in/yarik        

From lists at onerussian.com  Mon Jul 22 21:23:38 2013
From: lists at onerussian.com (Yaroslav Halchenko)
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 15:23:38 -0400
Subject: [Pandas-dev] 0.12
In-Reply-To: <CAJPUwMBvVo+7Fi3YsnLaNj1ta9LJtkfpHb2xytCYP-n3CsgMsA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <946567E8-0093-46D4-9487-CDC25E634A03@yahoo.com>
	<20130720134214.GM17125@onerussian.com>
	<4AA0EC63-5B0C-40EB-8089-5DA24F64F0AE@gmail.com>
	<CAJPUwMBvVo+7Fi3YsnLaNj1ta9LJtkfpHb2xytCYP-n3CsgMsA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20130722192338.GZ17125@onerussian.com>

btw -- what is the opinion about doctests, should I not run them on the
buildbot?  there is a bulk of failed ones, e.g. see through
http://nipy.bic.berkeley.edu/builders/pandas-py2.x-sid-sparc/builds/0/steps/shell_3/logs/stdio

NB disregard DISPLAY ones, and probably those where nose failed to
import module since apiclient is N/A

On Mon, 22 Jul 2013, Wes McKinney wrote:

> I can cut the release this afternoon (pacific) if all looks good.

> On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Jeff Reback <jeffreback at gmail.com> wrote:
> > good to go?

> > On Jul 20, 2013, at 9:42 AM, Yaroslav Halchenko <lists at onerussian.com> wrote:


> >> On Fri, 19 Jul 2013, Jeff Reback wrote:

> >>> all remaining issues with ujson and reported Debian failures on big endian now closed

> >>> pending whatever Yaroslavl wants to retest I think good to go for release

> >> if there is time I would like to reupload current master to debian
> >> proper and see how it builds across... that is not mandatory to wait
> >> though -- I could always apply patches later on, but it might be nice to
> >> kick out a 'totally clean' release.

> >> building it now

> >> Cheers
> >> --
> >> Yaroslav O. Halchenko, Ph.D.
> >> http://neuro.debian.net http://www.pymvpa.org http://www.fail2ban.org
> >> Senior Research Associate,     Psychological and Brain Sciences Dept.
> >> Dartmouth College, 419 Moore Hall, Hinman Box 6207, Hanover, NH 03755
> >> Phone: +1 (603) 646-9834                       Fax: +1 (603) 646-1419
> >> WWW:   http://www.linkedin.com/in/yarik
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Pandas-dev mailing list
> >> Pandas-dev at python.org
> >> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pandas-dev
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pandas-dev mailing list
> > Pandas-dev at python.org
> > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pandas-dev


-- 
Yaroslav O. Halchenko, Ph.D.
http://neuro.debian.net http://www.pymvpa.org http://www.fail2ban.org
Senior Research Associate,     Psychological and Brain Sciences Dept.
Dartmouth College, 419 Moore Hall, Hinman Box 6207, Hanover, NH 03755
Phone: +1 (603) 646-9834                       Fax: +1 (603) 646-1419
WWW:   http://www.linkedin.com/in/yarik        

From jreback at yahoo.com  Mon Jul 22 21:26:25 2013
From: jreback at yahoo.com (Jeff Reback)
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 12:26:25 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [Pandas-dev] PR's soon after 0.12
Message-ID: <1374521185.78241.YahooMailNeo@web142703.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>

All,

a couple of big PR's that would like to merge soon after 0.12. Pls take a look and comment.

Series refactor:
https://github.com/pydata/pandas/pull/3482


comment on this pr for major refactor of Series to be a subclass of NDFrame
(and corresponding consolidation of methods et al)

Pretty much preserves all APIs (except small changes as noted) and perf.

Eval (primarily by @cpcloud):
https://github.com/pydata/pandas/pull/4164


provides a nice mechanism to evaluate directly with numexpr as well as expanded syntax

e.g.

df = DataFrame(randn(100000,2),columns=list('AB'))

df['A>0 and B>0'] (this is implemented by df.query(...))

as well as the generic:?pd.eval('....')

(FYI the allowing of 'and' to be equivalent of '&') is the only real 'API' change here
in that its something that neither python nor numpy allow but makes syntax 'nicer'


thanks,

Jeff
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/pandas-dev/attachments/20130722/dd4a53f7/attachment-0001.html>

From jreback at yahoo.com  Mon Jul 22 21:37:12 2013
From: jreback at yahoo.com (Jeff Reback)
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 12:37:12 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [Pandas-dev] docs for eval
Message-ID: <1374521832.23472.YahooMailNeo@web142706.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>

phillip put up a test of the new eval section in the docs FYI

http://phillipcloud.com/doc/build/html/enhancingperf.html#expression-evaluation-via-eval
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/pandas-dev/attachments/20130722/0af6de9e/attachment.html>

From lists at onerussian.com  Tue Jul 23 20:45:56 2013
From: lists at onerussian.com (Yaroslav Halchenko)
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 14:45:56 -0400
Subject: [Pandas-dev] 0.12
In-Reply-To: <CAJPUwMBvVo+7Fi3YsnLaNj1ta9LJtkfpHb2xytCYP-n3CsgMsA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <946567E8-0093-46D4-9487-CDC25E634A03@yahoo.com>
	<20130720134214.GM17125@onerussian.com>
	<4AA0EC63-5B0C-40EB-8089-5DA24F64F0AE@gmail.com>
	<CAJPUwMBvVo+7Fi3YsnLaNj1ta9LJtkfpHb2xytCYP-n3CsgMsA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20130723184556.GG17125@onerussian.com>

FWIW -- sparc testing is automated now

http://nipy.bic.berkeley.edu/tgrid?category=pandas
http://nipy.bic.berkeley.edu/waterfall?category=pandas

all green atm

On Mon, 22 Jul 2013, Wes McKinney wrote:

> I can cut the release this afternoon (pacific) if all looks good.

> On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Jeff Reback <jeffreback at gmail.com> wrote:
> > good to go?

> > On Jul 20, 2013, at 9:42 AM, Yaroslav Halchenko <lists at onerussian.com> wrote:
-- 
Yaroslav O. Halchenko, Ph.D.
http://neuro.debian.net http://www.pymvpa.org http://www.fail2ban.org
Senior Research Associate,     Psychological and Brain Sciences Dept.
Dartmouth College, 419 Moore Hall, Hinman Box 6207, Hanover, NH 03755
Phone: +1 (603) 646-9834                       Fax: +1 (603) 646-1419
WWW:   http://www.linkedin.com/in/yarik        

From wesmckinn at gmail.com  Tue Jul 23 21:14:41 2013
From: wesmckinn at gmail.com (Wes McKinney)
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 12:14:41 -0700
Subject: [Pandas-dev] 0.12
In-Reply-To: <20130723184556.GG17125@onerussian.com>
References: <946567E8-0093-46D4-9487-CDC25E634A03@yahoo.com>
	<20130720134214.GM17125@onerussian.com>
	<4AA0EC63-5B0C-40EB-8089-5DA24F64F0AE@gmail.com>
	<CAJPUwMBvVo+7Fi3YsnLaNj1ta9LJtkfpHb2xytCYP-n3CsgMsA@mail.gmail.com>
	<20130723184556.GG17125@onerussian.com>
Message-ID: <CAJPUwMCZro6BWQ8WGuzRaNWLFNzwR4ab=dOW7oBQWOT8wSPrHQ@mail.gmail.com>

Great. Today may finally be the day

On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Yaroslav Halchenko
<lists at onerussian.com> wrote:
> FWIW -- sparc testing is automated now
>
> http://nipy.bic.berkeley.edu/tgrid?category=pandas
> http://nipy.bic.berkeley.edu/waterfall?category=pandas
>
> all green atm
>
> On Mon, 22 Jul 2013, Wes McKinney wrote:
>
>> I can cut the release this afternoon (pacific) if all looks good.
>
>> On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Jeff Reback <jeffreback at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > good to go?
>
>> > On Jul 20, 2013, at 9:42 AM, Yaroslav Halchenko <lists at onerussian.com> wrote:
> --
> Yaroslav O. Halchenko, Ph.D.
> http://neuro.debian.net http://www.pymvpa.org http://www.fail2ban.org
> Senior Research Associate,     Psychological and Brain Sciences Dept.
> Dartmouth College, 419 Moore Hall, Hinman Box 6207, Hanover, NH 03755
> Phone: +1 (603) 646-9834                       Fax: +1 (603) 646-1419
> WWW:   http://www.linkedin.com/in/yarik

From cpcloud at gmail.com  Wed Jul 24 18:14:16 2013
From: cpcloud at gmail.com (Phillip Cloud)
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 12:14:16 -0400
Subject: [Pandas-dev] chat
Message-ID: <CAKRVfm5kKZaHL42gWoJLS_a3sAK4utwQe5_jm7epJ_jjSq+UNg@mail.gmail.com>

Hi all,

I set up a chat room at http://pandas-dev.hipchat.com

i can post the link to join if you guys are interested. i have it for 30
days before i have to start shelling out dough.

Wes, do you already have the pandas subdomain?

--
Best,
Phillip Cloud
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/pandas-dev/attachments/20130724/31980418/attachment.html>

From wesmckinn at gmail.com  Wed Jul 24 22:30:23 2013
From: wesmckinn at gmail.com (Wes McKinney)
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 13:30:23 -0700
Subject: [Pandas-dev] chat
In-Reply-To: <CAKRVfm5kKZaHL42gWoJLS_a3sAK4utwQe5_jm7epJ_jjSq+UNg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAKRVfm5kKZaHL42gWoJLS_a3sAK4utwQe5_jm7epJ_jjSq+UNg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAJPUwMC-f-4aK1SeZ85z6cqyb2OOjc5jAsL=hfEwL4pV_HDVVg@mail.gmail.com>

I think it's always free for <= 5 users

On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 9:14 AM, Phillip Cloud <cpcloud at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I set up a chat room at http://pandas-dev.hipchat.com
>
> i can post the link to join if you guys are interested. i have it for 30
> days before i have to start shelling out dough.
>
> Wes, do you already have the pandas subdomain?
>
> --
> Best,
> Phillip Cloud
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pandas-dev mailing list
> Pandas-dev at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pandas-dev
>

From changshe at gmail.com  Wed Jul 24 22:47:30 2013
From: changshe at gmail.com (Chang She)
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 13:47:30 -0700
Subject: [Pandas-dev] chat
In-Reply-To: <CAJPUwMC-f-4aK1SeZ85z6cqyb2OOjc5jAsL=hfEwL4pV_HDVVg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAKRVfm5kKZaHL42gWoJLS_a3sAK4utwQe5_jm7epJ_jjSq+UNg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJPUwMC-f-4aK1SeZ85z6cqyb2OOjc5jAsL=hfEwL4pV_HDVVg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CADwh0WO85A-7Zb=SJbH2gr4f2ota2_pGr+oQLXn4LsnLiOYfWQ@mail.gmail.com>

I just wrote to hipchat to ask for a free account for up to 10 people
on a permanent basis.
I'll keep you guys updated.

On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Wes McKinney <wesmckinn at gmail.com> wrote:
> I think it's always free for <= 5 users
>
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 9:14 AM, Phillip Cloud <cpcloud at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I set up a chat room at http://pandas-dev.hipchat.com
>>
>> i can post the link to join if you guys are interested. i have it for 30
>> days before i have to start shelling out dough.
>>
>> Wes, do you already have the pandas subdomain?
>>
>> --
>> Best,
>> Phillip Cloud
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pandas-dev mailing list
>> Pandas-dev at python.org
>> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pandas-dev
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Pandas-dev mailing list
> Pandas-dev at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pandas-dev

From cpcloud at gmail.com  Thu Jul 25 01:39:24 2013
From: cpcloud at gmail.com (Phillip Cloud)
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 19:39:24 -0400
Subject: [Pandas-dev] chat
In-Reply-To: <CADwh0WO85A-7Zb=SJbH2gr4f2ota2_pGr+oQLXn4LsnLiOYfWQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAKRVfm5kKZaHL42gWoJLS_a3sAK4utwQe5_jm7epJ_jjSq+UNg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJPUwMC-f-4aK1SeZ85z6cqyb2OOjc5jAsL=hfEwL4pV_HDVVg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CADwh0WO85A-7Zb=SJbH2gr4f2ota2_pGr+oQLXn4LsnLiOYfWQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAKRVfm4yuqkuXONgsV2Nn9rhFTmai+amrc0r5V-OrCndNPUHMA@mail.gmail.com>

Excellent! Thanks Chang.


--
Best,
Phillip Cloud


On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 4:47 PM, Chang She <changshe at gmail.com> wrote:

> I just wrote to hipchat to ask for a free account for up to 10 people
> on a permanent basis.
> I'll keep you guys updated.
>
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Wes McKinney <wesmckinn at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I think it's always free for <= 5 users
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 9:14 AM, Phillip Cloud <cpcloud at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I set up a chat room at http://pandas-dev.hipchat.com
> >>
> >> i can post the link to join if you guys are interested. i have it for 30
> >> days before i have to start shelling out dough.
> >>
> >> Wes, do you already have the pandas subdomain?
> >>
> >> --
> >> Best,
> >> Phillip Cloud
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Pandas-dev mailing list
> >> Pandas-dev at python.org
> >> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pandas-dev
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pandas-dev mailing list
> > Pandas-dev at python.org
> > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pandas-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/pandas-dev/attachments/20130724/032e6a32/attachment.html>

From jreback at yahoo.com  Thu Jul 25 17:08:21 2013
From: jreback at yahoo.com (Jeff Reback)
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 08:08:21 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [Pandas-dev] is there supposed to be a windows 3.3 build on pypi?
Message-ID: <1374764901.37893.YahooMailNeo@web142703.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>



?
I can be reached on my cell (917)971-6387
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/pandas-dev/attachments/20130725/ff73d5de/attachment.html>

From wesmckinn at gmail.com  Fri Jul 26 02:43:24 2013
From: wesmckinn at gmail.com (Wes McKinney)
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 17:43:24 -0700
Subject: [Pandas-dev] is there supposed to be a windows 3.3 build on
	pypi?
In-Reply-To: <1374764901.37893.YahooMailNeo@web142703.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
References: <1374764901.37893.YahooMailNeo@web142703.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <CAJPUwMDU8TNZHoM-2DsRN7nn-DXN3z2CEn27i=g+23_EU3MoJQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 8:08 AM, Jeff Reback <jreback at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> I can be reached on my cell (917)971-6387
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pandas-dev mailing list
> Pandas-dev at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pandas-dev
>

Python 3.3 binaries are up on PyPI now (need to get our build box
configured with VS2010 so we can build them ourselves).

- Wes

From jreback at yahoo.com  Mon Jul 29 13:35:13 2013
From: jreback at yahoo.com (Jeff Reback)
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 04:35:13 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [Pandas-dev] https://github.com/pydata/pandas/pull/4384
Message-ID: <1375097713.47488.YahooMailNeo@web142701.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>

This is @jtratners conversion of pandas from 2 to 3 in the codebase itself,
incorporating the six module.

It alleviates the needs for 2to3 (and makes builds faster).

Looks ready to merge to me

touches almost every file, so holding up all other PR's until this is in.

anyone have final comments...?

Jeff
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/pandas-dev/attachments/20130729/7b3a5f8a/attachment.html>

From wesmckinn at gmail.com  Tue Jul 30 01:26:35 2013
From: wesmckinn at gmail.com (Wes McKinney)
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 16:26:35 -0700
Subject: [Pandas-dev] https://github.com/pydata/pandas/pull/4384
In-Reply-To: <1375097713.47488.YahooMailNeo@web142701.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
References: <1375097713.47488.YahooMailNeo@web142701.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
Message-ID: <CAJPUwMBhMn6wHUA8XdYrVXU-M+VfXf0FyC91Bm_NVF2YBnkBHg@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 4:35 AM, Jeff Reback <jreback at yahoo.com> wrote:
> This is @jtratners conversion of pandas from 2 to 3 in the codebase itself,
> incorporating the six module.
>
> It alleviates the needs for 2to3 (and makes builds faster).
>
> Looks ready to merge to me
>
> touches almost every file, so holding up all other PR's until this is in.
>
> anyone have final comments...?
>
> Jeff
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pandas-dev mailing list
> Pandas-dev at python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pandas-dev
>

I'm fine with this going in, bombs away. Going to be fun maintaining a
2+3-compliant codebase going forward but I recognize that it's a best
practice.

- Wes

From jreback at yahoo.com  Wed Jul 31 04:14:05 2013
From: jreback at yahoo.com (Jeff Reback)
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 22:14:05 -0400
Subject: [Pandas-dev] can we enable dev daily builds ?
Message-ID: <361EBD49-35BC-4284-83E9-0E52DE2FDCCF@yahoo.com>





From changshe at gmail.com  Wed Jul 31 21:19:57 2013
From: changshe at gmail.com (Chang She)
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 12:19:57 -0700
Subject: [Pandas-dev] chat
In-Reply-To: <CAKRVfm4yuqkuXONgsV2Nn9rhFTmai+amrc0r5V-OrCndNPUHMA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAKRVfm5kKZaHL42gWoJLS_a3sAK4utwQe5_jm7epJ_jjSq+UNg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJPUwMC-f-4aK1SeZ85z6cqyb2OOjc5jAsL=hfEwL4pV_HDVVg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CADwh0WO85A-7Zb=SJbH2gr4f2ota2_pGr+oQLXn4LsnLiOYfWQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAKRVfm4yuqkuXONgsV2Nn9rhFTmai+amrc0r5V-OrCndNPUHMA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CADwh0WMUNSNUoRdFqPvvAJwAMzSUG+nM3pD-=piqvW1hMB7nSw@mail.gmail.com>

they agreed to give us 6 months for free. Phillip I'll send you the code.


On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Phillip Cloud <cpcloud at gmail.com> wrote:

> Excellent! Thanks Chang.
>
>
> --
> Best,
> Phillip Cloud
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 4:47 PM, Chang She <changshe at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I just wrote to hipchat to ask for a free account for up to 10 people
>> on a permanent basis.
>> I'll keep you guys updated.
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Wes McKinney <wesmckinn at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > I think it's always free for <= 5 users
>> >
>> > On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 9:14 AM, Phillip Cloud <cpcloud at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >> Hi all,
>> >>
>> >> I set up a chat room at http://pandas-dev.hipchat.com
>> >>
>> >> i can post the link to join if you guys are interested. i have it for
>> 30
>> >> days before i have to start shelling out dough.
>> >>
>> >> Wes, do you already have the pandas subdomain?
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Best,
>> >> Phillip Cloud
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> Pandas-dev mailing list
>> >> Pandas-dev at python.org
>> >> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pandas-dev
>> >>
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Pandas-dev mailing list
>> > Pandas-dev at python.org
>> > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pandas-dev
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/pandas-dev/attachments/20130731/2bf3a0bb/attachment.html>

From cpcloud at gmail.com  Wed Jul 31 21:37:43 2013
From: cpcloud at gmail.com (Phillip Cloud)
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 15:37:43 -0400
Subject: [Pandas-dev] hipchat
Message-ID: <CAKRVfm6B+6G6Fuh=F8BcKgEWQgDkpNYoFYLh2VuU86Zf85MZjQ@mail.gmail.com>

hey guys the chat room is up

i'm a little hesitant to post the link on the ML so if you'd like to opt in
then send me an email and i'll add you to the list of users.

--
Best,
Phillip Cloud
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/pandas-dev/attachments/20130731/c42f6673/attachment.html>