From yoval at gmx.com  Wed Dec  4 20:59:14 2013
From: yoval at gmx.com (yoval p.)
Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2013 21:59:14 +0200
Subject: [Pandas-dev] pandas 0.13 timeline
In-Reply-To: <CADwh0WPh_=GV4xRAPF65LbRnU9N5Ay1o3toMGAmNO_1w-6L1yg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAJPUwMD+oyxKiX2TV5et7rxo9QFMz6kdZpM06QZm+PRc7ievTw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CADwh0WPh_=GV4xRAPF65LbRnU9N5Ay1o3toMGAmNO_1w-6L1yg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <529F8992.3080207@gmx.com>

http://pandas.pydata.org/pandas-build/dev/ suggests the wacky filenames
started appearing in july. My guess would be #4218 is to blame,
It was merged right about that time and changed the format of the
version string for dev versions (for good reason I thought, see issue).
Jenkins disapproves for some reason.

An aside: no ANN on the ml for 0.13.0rc1? shout if you need
someone else to do it. jreback is the obvious choice but
I'll do it if needed.

- Yoval


On 11/22/2013 10:25 PM, Chang She wrote:
> Hey guys,
> 
> Does anyone know jenkins well? I'm trying to fix a problem where the
> windows binaries are getting built with the jenkins job name + number in
> the file name.
> I tracked it down to the fact that jenkins is for some reason creating
> local tags that matches the jenkins job name + build number. 
> So when setup is run, the version number is that tag name, which means
> the windows binaries are built with that name.
> 
> I have teamviewer setup on the windows box here so if anyone is willing
> to help that would be much appreciated! Or if anyone know what's wrong
> and can tell me what to do, that would also work.
> 
> Thanks!!!
> 
> Chang
> 
> 
> On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Wes McKinney <wesmckinn at gmail.com
> <mailto:wesmckinn at gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
>     hi all,
> 
>     sorry I haven't been much help last few months. PyData is next weekend
>     and I definitely plan to have a 0.13 RC cut by then. I'll try to get
>     to remaining PR reviews you asked me about and I'll tinker with the
>     windows build machine tomorrow and report any windows-specific
>     failures.
> 
>     - Wes
>     _______________________________________________
>     Pandas-dev mailing list
>     Pandas-dev at python.org <mailto:Pandas-dev at python.org>
>     https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pandas-dev
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pandas-dev mailing list
> Pandas-dev at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pandas-dev
> 


From jeffreback at gmail.com  Thu Dec 19 20:11:19 2013
From: jeffreback at gmail.com (Jeff Reback)
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 14:11:19 -0500
Subject: [Pandas-dev] 0.13
Message-ID: <87B9D78B-5B64-406E-8040-6E0703EA9EBF@gmail.com>



ok my fault for doing bug fixes but I think consensus of a rc2 with nothing except really really critical stuff

seems windows build are already updated  via Jenkins

just need an announcement and copy of the latest windows to the rc2 filenames

any objections?

Jeff 

From yoval at gmx.com  Thu Dec 19 21:06:49 2013
From: yoval at gmx.com (yoval p.)
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 22:06:49 +0200
Subject: [Pandas-dev] 0.13
In-Reply-To: <87B9D78B-5B64-406E-8040-6E0703EA9EBF@gmail.com>
References: <87B9D78B-5B64-406E-8040-6E0703EA9EBF@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <52B351D9.4060200@gmx.com>

bug-fixes only is the whole point of the RC, no? no fault to be had.
I'm occasionally monitoring the windows CI front, with hopes that
by keeping windows green continually, the badgers at datapad will be
freed from release yack-shaving and can just push out the binaries+ANN.

No objections at all to RC2, but also may not be necessary if only bug
fixes have been added, really just want to see a drop in bug report
rate.

Y

On 12/19/2013 09:11 PM, Jeff Reback wrote:
> 
> 
> ok my fault for doing bug fixes but I think consensus of a rc2 with nothing except really really critical stuff
> 
> seems windows build are already updated  via Jenkins
> 
> just need an announcement and copy of the latest windows to the rc2 filenames
> 
> any objections?
> 
> Jeff 
> _______________________________________________
> Pandas-dev mailing list
> Pandas-dev at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pandas-dev
> 


From wesmckinn at gmail.com  Fri Dec 20 22:50:47 2013
From: wesmckinn at gmail.com (Wes McKinney)
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 13:50:47 -0800
Subject: [Pandas-dev] 0.13
In-Reply-To: <52B351D9.4060200@gmx.com>
References: <87B9D78B-5B64-406E-8040-6E0703EA9EBF@gmail.com>
 <52B351D9.4060200@gmx.com>
Message-ID: <CAJPUwMAe87b9jnrW780X_O=hq7CwHMwCXBXNhpkko1J66n_Rfw@mail.gmail.com>

Would you like us to cut an RC2? I'm leaving town on the 22nd but
Chang will be around and may have a little time.

- Wes

On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 12:06 PM, yoval p. <yoval at gmx.com> wrote:
> bug-fixes only is the whole point of the RC, no? no fault to be had.
> I'm occasionally monitoring the windows CI front, with hopes that
> by keeping windows green continually, the badgers at datapad will be
> freed from release yack-shaving and can just push out the binaries+ANN.
>
> No objections at all to RC2, but also may not be necessary if only bug
> fixes have been added, really just want to see a drop in bug report
> rate.
>
> Y
>
> On 12/19/2013 09:11 PM, Jeff Reback wrote:
>>
>>
>> ok my fault for doing bug fixes but I think consensus of a rc2 with nothing except really really critical stuff
>>
>> seems windows build are already updated  via Jenkins
>>
>> just need an announcement and copy of the latest windows to the rc2 filenames
>>
>> any objections?
>>
>> Jeff
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pandas-dev mailing list
>> Pandas-dev at python.org
>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pandas-dev
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pandas-dev mailing list
> Pandas-dev at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pandas-dev

From jeffreback at gmail.com  Sat Dec 21 15:57:19 2013
From: jeffreback at gmail.com (Jeff Reback)
Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2013 09:57:19 -0500
Subject: [Pandas-dev] 0.13
In-Reply-To: <CAJPUwMAe87b9jnrW780X_O=hq7CwHMwCXBXNhpkko1J66n_Rfw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <87B9D78B-5B64-406E-8040-6E0703EA9EBF@gmail.com>
 <52B351D9.4060200@gmx.com>
 <CAJPUwMAe87b9jnrW780X_O=hq7CwHMwCXBXNhpkko1J66n_Rfw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <12035EFA-93C7-4832-AEB2-B89692FB7BB7@gmail.com>

unless anyone has any objections
I think ready for an rc2


> On Dec 20, 2013, at 4:50 PM, Wes McKinney <wesmckinn at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Would you like us to cut an RC2? I'm leaving town on the 22nd but
> Chang will be around and may have a little time.
> 
> - Wes
> 
>> On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 12:06 PM, yoval p. <yoval at gmx.com> wrote:
>> bug-fixes only is the whole point of the RC, no? no fault to be had.
>> I'm occasionally monitoring the windows CI front, with hopes that
>> by keeping windows green continually, the badgers at datapad will be
>> freed from release yack-shaving and can just push out the binaries+ANN.
>> 
>> No objections at all to RC2, but also may not be necessary if only bug
>> fixes have been added, really just want to see a drop in bug report
>> rate.
>> 
>> Y
>> 
>>> On 12/19/2013 09:11 PM, Jeff Reback wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ok my fault for doing bug fixes but I think consensus of a rc2 with nothing except really really critical stuff
>>> 
>>> seems windows build are already updated  via Jenkins
>>> 
>>> just need an announcement and copy of the latest windows to the rc2 filenames
>>> 
>>> any objections?
>>> 
>>> Jeff
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Pandas-dev mailing list
>>> Pandas-dev at python.org
>>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pandas-dev
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pandas-dev mailing list
>> Pandas-dev at python.org
>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pandas-dev
> _______________________________________________
> Pandas-dev mailing list
> Pandas-dev at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pandas-dev

From yoval at gmx.com  Sat Dec 21 16:10:06 2013
From: yoval at gmx.com (yoval p.)
Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2013 17:10:06 +0200
Subject: [Pandas-dev] 0.13
In-Reply-To: <12035EFA-93C7-4832-AEB2-B89692FB7BB7@gmail.com>
References: <87B9D78B-5B64-406E-8040-6E0703EA9EBF@gmail.com>
 <52B351D9.4060200@gmx.com>
 <CAJPUwMAe87b9jnrW780X_O=hq7CwHMwCXBXNhpkko1J66n_Rfw@mail.gmail.com>
 <12035EFA-93C7-4832-AEB2-B89692FB7BB7@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <52B5AF4E.7050803@gmx.com>

Go for it.

On 12/21/2013 04:57 PM, Jeff Reback wrote:
> unless anyone has any objections
> I think ready for an rc2
> 
> 
>> On Dec 20, 2013, at 4:50 PM, Wes McKinney <wesmckinn at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Would you like us to cut an RC2? I'm leaving town on the 22nd but
>> Chang will be around and may have a little time.
>>
>> - Wes
>>
>>> On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 12:06 PM, yoval p. <yoval at gmx.com> wrote:
>>> bug-fixes only is the whole point of the RC, no? no fault to be had.
>>> I'm occasionally monitoring the windows CI front, with hopes that
>>> by keeping windows green continually, the badgers at datapad will be
>>> freed from release yack-shaving and can just push out the binaries+ANN.
>>>
>>> No objections at all to RC2, but also may not be necessary if only bug
>>> fixes have been added, really just want to see a drop in bug report
>>> rate.
>>>
>>> Y
>>>
>>>> On 12/19/2013 09:11 PM, Jeff Reback wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ok my fault for doing bug fixes but I think consensus of a rc2 with nothing except really really critical stuff
>>>>
>>>> seems windows build are already updated  via Jenkins
>>>>
>>>> just need an announcement and copy of the latest windows to the rc2 filenames
>>>>
>>>> any objections?
>>>>
>>>> Jeff
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Pandas-dev mailing list
>>>> Pandas-dev at python.org
>>>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pandas-dev
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Pandas-dev mailing list
>>> Pandas-dev at python.org
>>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pandas-dev
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pandas-dev mailing list
>> Pandas-dev at python.org
>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pandas-dev
> 


From yoval at gmx.com  Fri Dec 27 21:43:01 2013
From: yoval at gmx.com (yoval p.)
Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2013 22:43:01 +0200
Subject: [Pandas-dev] Heads-Up: 0.13 final
Message-ID: <52BDE655.8010907@gmx.com>

Hi guys and happy holidays,

Status on 0.13:
- The bug queue is empty
- Windows is green here
- We're awaiting confirmation on final sparc fixes from @yarikoptic
- The RC period has maxed it's potential IMO.

Instead of an RC2 as we planned, I suggest we release the final
and hold off on new code for a couple of weeks (an RC except by name).
That'll get more users trying it out but still leaves us a window
to release 0.13.1 if we must.

After that we'll launch the new 3 month release cycle for 0.14. Some PRs
are already waiting in the queue so as to get maximum testing
over the period until 0.14. Hopefully over time more and more
of the big changes will be ready to merge at the beginning of a new
cycle rather then near it's end.

Wes & chang, are you cool with jreback/me tagging 0.13 once everything
is in place? The ANN and binaries can follow when you manage to spare
the time. Hopefully, with me watching the windows CI and jreback
squashing them bugs conan-style that shouldn't take up much time.

- Y


From wesmckinn at gmail.com  Mon Dec 30 17:49:07 2013
From: wesmckinn at gmail.com (Wes McKinney)
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2013 08:49:07 -0800
Subject: [Pandas-dev] Heads-Up: 0.13 final
In-Reply-To: <52BDE655.8010907@gmx.com>
References: <52BDE655.8010907@gmx.com>
Message-ID: <CAJPUwMAZFWKkaj3hqUwuVZZpS7ai7_w3nb5ncgEq0TXngMbWhw@mail.gmail.com>

hi YP,

Please go ahead and tag the release. Either you or Jeff should
announce the release on the usual channels once the binaries make it
through the tubes to PyPI. We'll be back in the office on 1/3 and can
do it then.

cheers and happy new year
Wes

On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 12:43 PM, yoval p. <yoval at gmx.com> wrote:
> Hi guys and happy holidays,
>
> Status on 0.13:
> - The bug queue is empty
> - Windows is green here
> - We're awaiting confirmation on final sparc fixes from @yarikoptic
> - The RC period has maxed it's potential IMO.
>
> Instead of an RC2 as we planned, I suggest we release the final
> and hold off on new code for a couple of weeks (an RC except by name).
> That'll get more users trying it out but still leaves us a window
> to release 0.13.1 if we must.
>
> After that we'll launch the new 3 month release cycle for 0.14. Some PRs
> are already waiting in the queue so as to get maximum testing
> over the period until 0.14. Hopefully over time more and more
> of the big changes will be ready to merge at the beginning of a new
> cycle rather then near it's end.
>
> Wes & chang, are you cool with jreback/me tagging 0.13 once everything
> is in place? The ANN and binaries can follow when you manage to spare
> the time. Hopefully, with me watching the windows CI and jreback
> squashing them bugs conan-style that shouldn't take up much time.
>
> - Y
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pandas-dev mailing list
> Pandas-dev at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pandas-dev

From jtratner at gmail.com  Sat Dec 21 15:58:45 2013
From: jtratner at gmail.com (Jeffrey Tratner)
Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2013 09:58:45 -0500
Subject: [Pandas-dev] 0.13
In-Reply-To: <12035EFA-93C7-4832-AEB2-B89692FB7BB7@gmail.com>
References: <87B9D78B-5B64-406E-8040-6E0703EA9EBF@gmail.com>
 <52B351D9.4060200@gmx.com>
 <CAJPUwMAe87b9jnrW780X_O=hq7CwHMwCXBXNhpkko1J66n_Rfw@mail.gmail.com>
 <12035EFA-93C7-4832-AEB2-B89692FB7BB7@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAEgxMck9_x6fiREYa+7-o_Q+3awdqqamXXMzp6TRSVvqWfFyYQ@mail.gmail.com>

+1 on rc2


On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Jeff Reback <jeffreback at gmail.com> wrote:

> unless anyone has any objections
> I think ready for an rc2
>
>
> > On Dec 20, 2013, at 4:50 PM, Wes McKinney <wesmckinn at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Would you like us to cut an RC2? I'm leaving town on the 22nd but
> > Chang will be around and may have a little time.
> >
> > - Wes
> >
> >> On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 12:06 PM, yoval p. <yoval at gmx.com> wrote:
> >> bug-fixes only is the whole point of the RC, no? no fault to be had.
> >> I'm occasionally monitoring the windows CI front, with hopes that
> >> by keeping windows green continually, the badgers at datapad will be
> >> freed from release yack-shaving and can just push out the binaries+ANN.
> >>
> >> No objections at all to RC2, but also may not be necessary if only bug
> >> fixes have been added, really just want to see a drop in bug report
> >> rate.
> >>
> >> Y
> >>
> >>> On 12/19/2013 09:11 PM, Jeff Reback wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ok my fault for doing bug fixes but I think consensus of a rc2 with
> nothing except really really critical stuff
> >>>
> >>> seems windows build are already updated  via Jenkins
> >>>
> >>> just need an announcement and copy of the latest windows to the rc2
> filenames
> >>>
> >>> any objections?
> >>>
> >>> Jeff
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Pandas-dev mailing list
> >>> Pandas-dev at python.org
> >>> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pandas-dev
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Pandas-dev mailing list
> >> Pandas-dev at python.org
> >> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pandas-dev
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pandas-dev mailing list
> > Pandas-dev at python.org
> > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pandas-dev
> _______________________________________________
> Pandas-dev mailing list
> Pandas-dev at python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pandas-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/pandas-dev/attachments/20131221/62a10a25/attachment.html>