[Numpy-svn] [numpy/numpy] 3a816a: BUG: recarrays viewed as subarrays don't convert t...

[GitHub]

  Branch: refs/heads/master
  Home:   https://github.com/numpy/numpy
  Commit: 3a816a4db9b498eb64eb837fdcca0fa8ddbe063e
      https://github.com/numpy/numpy/commit/3a816a4db9b498eb64eb837fdcca0fa8ddbe063e
  Author: Allan Haldane <allan.haldane at gmail.com>
  Date:   2015-10-17 (Sat, 17 Oct 2015)

  Changed paths:
    M numpy/core/records.py
    M numpy/core/tests/test_records.py

  Log Message:
  -----------
  BUG: recarrays viewed as subarrays don't convert to np.record type

Record array views were updated in #5943 to return np.record dtype
where possible, but forgot about the case of sub-arrays.

That's fixed here, so accessing subarray fields by attribute or index
works sensibly, as well as viewing a record array as a subarray dtype,
and printing subarrays.

This also happens to fix #6459, since it affects the same lines.

Fixes #6497 #6459


  Commit: 8cf83ee92aaba5a802799b752621f7c413cace34
      https://github.com/numpy/numpy/commit/8cf83ee92aaba5a802799b752621f7c413cace34
  Author: Charles Harris <charlesr.harris at gmail.com>
  Date:   2015-10-18 (Sun, 18 Oct 2015)

  Changed paths:
    M numpy/core/records.py
    M numpy/core/tests/test_records.py

  Log Message:
  -----------
  Merge pull request #6500 from ahaldane/recarray_view_fix

BUG: recarrays viewed as subarrays don't convert to np.record type


Compare: https://github.com/numpy/numpy/compare/c9dcd91ed1e2...8cf83ee92aab