[Numpy-discussion] broadcasting for randint

G Young gfyoung17 at gmail.com
Tue Jun 7 13:23:59 EDT 2016


There seems to be a push in my PR now for using Tempita as a way to solve
this issue with the ad-hoc templating.  However, before I go about
attempting this, it would be great to receive feedback from other
developers on this, especially from some of the numpy maintainers.  Thanks!

On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 3:04 AM, G Young <gfyoung17 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Just wanted to ping the mailing list again in case this email (see below)
> got lost in your inboxes.  Would be great to get some feedback on this!
> Thanks!
>
> On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 2:15 AM, G Young <gfyoung17 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have had a PR <https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/6938> open for
>> quite some time now that allows arguments to broadcast in *randint*.
>> While the functionality is fully in-place and very robust, the obstacle at
>> this point is the implementation.
>>
>> When the *dtype* parameter was added to *randint* (see here
>> <https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/6910>), a big issue with the
>> implementation was that it created so much duplicate code that it would be
>> a huge maintenance nightmare.  However, this was dismissed in the original
>> PR message because it was believed that template-ing would be trivial,
>> which seemed reasonable at the time.
>>
>> When I added broadcasting, I introduced a template system to the code
>> that dramatically cut down on the duplication.  However, the obstacle has
>> been whether or not this template system is too *ad hoc* to be merged
>> into the library.  Implementing a template in Cython was not considered
>> sufficient and is in fact very tricky to do, and unfortunately, I have not
>> received any constructive suggestions from maintainers about how to
>> proceed, so I'm opening this up to the mailing to see whether or not there
>> are better alternatives to what I did, whether this should be merged as it,
>> or whether this should be tabled until a better template can be found.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20160607/219d9602/attachment.html>


More information about the NumPy-Discussion mailing list