[Numpy-discussion] Open CV 3.0 + NPY_RELAXED_STRIDES

[Jaime Fernández del Río]

On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 2:44 AM, Julian Taylor <
jtaylor.debian at googlemail.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 11:39 AM, Sebastian Berg
> <sebastian at sipsolutions.net> wrote:
> > On Mi, 2015-06-10 at 21:03 -0600, Charles R Harris wrote:
> >>
> >>
> > <snip>
> >>
> >>
> >>               * Relaxed stride checking will be the default in 1.10.0
> >>         Is this still the plan?
> >>
> >>
> >> Yes, but it won't be quite the same as the master branch.  Currently
> >> an unusual value for the stride (?) is used in order to smoke out
> >> misuse, but that value will be more rational in the release.
> >>
> >
> > +1, it should not be as bad/common in practice once rolled out. That
> > said, I do not mind delaying things beyond 1.10, it might be better for
> > compatibility if someone gets a new numpy on top of oldish other
> > packages.
> > So I am good with planning to go ahead for the moment. But if anyone
> > complains, I would back down for 1.10 probably.
> >
> > - Sebastian
> >
>
> With beside scipy.ndimage also opencv being broken I think we will
> have to delay it beyond 1.10, though we should have at least an alpha,
> maybe even a beta with it enabled to induce some panic that hopefully
> will spure some fixes.
>

OpenCV shouldn't be broken any more if the merge this:

https://github.com/Itseez/opencv/pull/4117

I would appreciate a second set of eyes looking over the logic in that PR.

Jaime

-- 
(\__/)
( O.o)
( > <) Este es Conejo. Copia a Conejo en tu firma y ayúdale en sus planes
de dominación mundial.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/attachments/20150611/2b103d29/attachment.html>